In this anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C, the applicant faced charges of kidnapping and rape under IPC and POCSO Act. The court, considering the gravity of offences and allegations in the victim statement. Held it was not a fit case for anticipatory bail and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 914 of 2016
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant : Mr. Abishek Saraf, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Neeraj Kumar Sharma, Dy.G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
06-10-2016
2
victim was kept in captivity by the present applicant and thereby the aforesaid offence was committed.
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Raju
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. can be extended to the applicant given the grave nature of the offences and positive allegations against him.
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Basant Yadav
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
