The application filed by Mohar Gupta under Section 438 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear in the second call despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
MCRC(A) No. 911 of 2016
Mohar Gupta, S/o. Rajnath Sao, Aged About 28 Years, R/o. Village : Murka, Post- Kerta Chainpur, Police Station Chalgali, District Balrampur, Chhattisgarh.
…....Applicant
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through the Station House Officer, Police Station Chalgali, District Balrampur, Chhattisgarh.
…....Respondent
| 06.10.2016 | None for the Applicant. iN Mr. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Anupam Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate for the State. Even in the second call, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the applicant, therefore, the Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. |
|
| Ashok | Sd/- Li (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail application filed under Section 438 CrPC should be allowed in absence of representation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohar Gupta
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
