Hem Narayan Banjare @ Hemu v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 377 of 201 6…
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 377 of 201 6…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 377 of 2016
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant: Mr. Yogesh Pandey, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State: Mr. Adhiraj Surana, Dy. Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
06/04 /2016
(1) Counsel for the applicant submits that with the passage of time
this bail application has become infructuous.
(2) Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
D/-
Hem Narayan Banjare
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court