Ghanshyam Yadu and Anr. v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected three bail applications filed on behalf of four applicants accused of criminal breach of trust and forgery. The court held that the failure to discharge duties resulting in substantial embezzlement of public funds disqualified the applicants from bail.
What did the court decide?
Bailapplications were dismissed.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Misc. Criminal Case No.1306 of 2016
- Ghanshyam Yadu, S/o Shri Kamaldhar Yadu, aged about 28 years, R/o Village Latapara, Post Office & Police Station Deobhog, Distt. Gariyaband (C.G.) (Computer Operator)
- Ghasiram Yadu, S/o Shri Shobharam Yadu, aged about 40 years, R/o Village Deobhog, Post Office & Police Station Deobhog, Distt. Gariyaband (C.G.)
---- Applicants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Station House Officer, Police Station Deobhog, Distt. Gariyaband (C.G.)
---- Non-applicant
Misc. Criminal Case No.1337 of 2016
Tulsi Ram Diwan, aged about 51 years, S/o Ghurau, R/o Village Sadak Parsuli, Police Station Gariyaband, C/o Devbhog, Police Station Gariyaband, Distt. Gariyaband (C.G.)
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicants are eligible for release on bail given the nature of the offences and their alleged roles in the embezzlement.
Whether the failure to perform supervisory duties or alleged forgery justifies denial of bail in cases involving public funds.
Whether the bail applications concerning the said arrests can be dismissed in light of the gravity of the offence.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ghanshyam Yadu
- applicant
Ghasiram Yadu
- applicant
Tulsi Ram Diwan
- applicant
Gulab Yadu
- respondent
State of Chhattisgarh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCRC/1306/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court