Dismissed

Hulas Sahu and Anr. v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC6 Apr 2016MCRC/1171/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a bail rejection order. The applicants moved an application under Section 439 CrPC for regular bail in a murder and assault case. The High Court, considering the gravity of the offence and the manner of the victim's death, rejected the application without releasing the applicants on bail.

What did the court decide?

Bail application rejected; applicants not released.

Hulas Sahu and Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 1171 of 2016

¶5

Hulas Sahu, son of Feru Sahu, aged about 30 years,

¶6

Taran Bai, w/o. Hulas Sahu, aged about 28 years,

¶7

Both R/o. Navagaon Kala, P.S. Khamhariya, District Bemetara (C.G.)

¶8

---- Applicants

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Office, Police Station Bemetara (C.G.)

¶11

---- Non-applicant

¶12

For Applicant: Mr. Uttam Pandeyl, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State:Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board

06/04 /2016

Heard.

(1) The accused/applicants have moved this bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing them on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 20/2015 registered at Police Station Khamhariya, District Bemetara (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 294,323,506(B),307 & 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

(2) Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that applicants and one other co-accused person assaulted complainant Dani Sahu (since deceased) by wooden stick and hand & fist, by which she succumbed to her injuries and thereby committed the aforesaid

¶19

¶20

offence.

¶21

(3) Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicants have falsely been implicated in the case as they have not committed any offence. He further submits that applicants are in jail since 21.10.2015 & 02.12.2015, respectively and the charge sheet has already been filed , and therefore, the applicant may be released on bail.

¶22

(4) On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

¶23

(5) Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence and the manner in which the complainant Dani Sahu is said to have been murdered by the applicants along with one co-accused person; I am not inclined to release the applicants on bail. Thus, the bail application is rejected.

¶24

Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶25

D/-

Hulas Sahu and Anr. v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hulas Sahu and Anr. v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Achche Lal Jaiswal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Anr.

Keshav Ram Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ghanshyam Yadu and Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Hem Narayan Banjare @ Hemu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Baghel Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Sushil Khakha Vs State Of Chhattisgarh