This order allowed a motion for the restoration of a writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution, finding the application filed within limitation.
The motion (MCC) was allowed; the dismissed writ petition WP(227) No.607 of 2015 was restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 7 of 2016
Versus
----Non-applicants/ Respondents
For Applicant – Shri K.A.Ansari, Senior Advocate with Shri Avinash Mishra,
Advocate.
For Respondents – None, not noticed.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai
Order on Board
12/01/2016
WP(227) No.607 of 2015 dismissed for want of prosecution on 14-12-2015
is restored to its original number.
Sd/(Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) JUDGE
Aadil
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the motion to restore a writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution is in time and should be allowed.
Smt. Shyambala W/o Shri Suresh Agrawal
Kamal Kishore Modi
Dinesh Modi
Smt. Laxmi Agrawal
Smt. Usha Khemka
Smt. Manju Agrawal
Chandra Bhushan Bajpai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
