Petitioner sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to accused for alleged sexual offences, claiming harassment and threats. Court noted victim had testified in court without alleging threats or influence, rejecting presumption of inducement and dismissing the petition.
Petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 520 of 2016
Versus
For the applicant : Mrs. Madhunisha Singh, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate For the State/Resp. 2 : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
18.10.2016
the petitioner and her family members which violates the terms and conditions of the bail order passed by this Court on 22.2.2016 in M.Cr.C.(A) 132 of 2016, therefore, the prayer is made to cancel the bail.
examination of the prosecutrix initially commenced on 27.7.2016 which further continued for cross examination on 28.07.2016 whereon detailed examination and cross examination of the petitioner were made.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE
R a o
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be cancelled due to alleged harassment and threats by the accused against the complainant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ku.Meena Verma
Sanjeet Netam
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
