Disposed

Ramlal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Oct 2016WPCR/215/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Order in a writ petition seeking action against a police officer alleged to be pressurizing applicants to deliver disputed land. The court directed the Superintendent of Police to decide a filed representation within two months and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Directed Superintendent of Police, District Surajpur to decide the filed representation within two months.

Ramlal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Chhattisgarh HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Page No.1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

W.P.(Cr.) No. 215 of 2016

¶5

Ramlal, S/o. Budhram, Caste-Kanwar, aged about 85 years,

¶6

Baratu, S/o. Ramlal, Caste Kanwar, aged about 57 years,

¶7

Jethoo, S/o. Ramlal, Caste- Kanwar, aged about 55 years,

¶8

Chhertu, S/o. Ramlal, Caste-Kanwar, aged about 53 years,

¶9

Ammelal, S/o. Baratu, Caste – Kanwar, aged about 37 years, All are R/o. Village- Bundiya, Police Station Bhatgaon, Tahsil Bhaiyathan, District – Surajpur (C.G.)

¶10

----Applicants

¶11

Versus

¶12

State of Chattisgarh, Through : Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.)

¶13

Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh, Police HQs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.)

¶14

Inspector General of Police, Chhattisgarh, Surguja Divn. Ambikapur, District – Surguja (C.G.)

¶15

Superintendent of Police, District – Surajpur (C.G.)

¶16

Station House Officer, Police Station Bhatgaon, Tahsil – Bhaiyathana, District – Surajpur (C.G.)

¶17

---- Respondents

¶18

For Applicants : Mr. Sushil Dubey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Ashutosh Pandey, Panel Lawyer

¶19

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

¶20

Order On Board

¶21

17/10/2016

¶22

The instant petition has been filed, whereby the relief is sought to take action against the respondent No.5, Station House Officer, Police Station – Bhatgaon, District – Surajpur as he is pressurizing the petitioner to deliver possession of land to the third party.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are being pressurized to deliver a possession of a land, which is under dispute before the Tahsildar and the police authority can not ask the petitioner to deliver possession to third party, consequently, the respondent No.3 and 4, Inspector General of Police, Surguja Division,

¶24

Page No.2

¶25

and Superintendent of Police, District – Surajpur may be directed to take action against the respondent No.5, Station House Officer, Bhatgaon. He further submits that representation has been filed before the Superintendent of Police, District – Surajpur and he may be directed to decide the same.

¶26

Perused the documents filed along with the petition without going into merits, prima-facie it appears one representation (Annexure P/1) has been filed by the petitioners before the Superintendent of Police, District – Surajpur.

¶27

In view of the above, Superintendent of Police, District Surajpur is directed to decide the same within further period of two months from the date of receipt of this order.

¶28

The petitioners shall be at liberty to make a fresh representation before the Superintendent of Police, Surajpur.

¶29

With such observation, the petition stands disposed off.

¶30

Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge

¶31

Balram

Ramlal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramlal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijaykumar Barman Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Haidar Ali Ansari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Abdulla Ansari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Kusum Bai and Ors. Vs the State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Som Distilleries Ltd. Vs the State of C.G.and Ors.

Santosh Kumar Chandrakar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh