High Court dismissed a contempt petition at the admission stage. The judge held that the impugned order only stayed transfer and did not address salary payment, so the grievance was outside the scope of the contempt proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Contempt Case (C) No. 468 of 2016
Kalpana Madame, D/o. Late Krishan Lal Madame, Aged About 55 Years, R/o. Shankarpur, Ward No.7, Rajnandgaon, P.S. Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant/ Petitioner Versus
---- Respondents/ Contemnor
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr. T.K.Tiwari, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order On Board
18.10.2016
Heard
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Ashok
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition regarding salary non-payment can be entertained when the prior order only stayed transfer.
Kalpana Madame
Mr. Rajesh Singh Rana
Mr. Sameer Pandey
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
