Disposed

Jagdish Prasad Shukla v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC7 Jan 2015WPS/7/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding the transfer of a teacher, the High Court of Chhattisgarh, without adjudicating merits, permitted the petitioner to withdraw the petition and file a detailed representation to the Collector to decide the matter expeditiously within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw petition and file a detailed representation with Respondent No.2; Collector directed to decide within four weeks.

Jagdish Prasad Shukla Vs State Of Chhattisgarh… — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2015)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶3

~^ W.P.fS.) N0. /2015

¶4

¶5

PETITIONER:

¶6

t ^ol
,,1^ ~^
w '^. r€^
^:^^" .«'' 'v?'. .^.t-^>Itl' ••••"< -»•'''
T^""
^^5

¶7

Jagdish Prasad Shulda S/o Late Shri NeeUsanth ghukla, aged about 46 Occupation Service, years, Upper Division Teacher presently working as a Cluster Academic Coordinator Cluster Center Kurda, Block Baloda Police Station Baloda, District- JanjgirChampa (C.G.)

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS

State of Chhattisgarh Through It's Secretary, School Education Departinent, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur (C.G.)

¶16

The Collector, Janjgir, District Janjgir-Chanipa (C.G.) The District Education Officer cum District Mission Director Rajeev Gandhi Shiksha Mission, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) The Block Education Officer, Baloda, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)

¶17

Rajendra Kumar Shukla (Teacher tilb^"" ]Arat), Government '^ Pre n Middle School, Kurda, Block Baloda, District Janjgir-Chamap (C.G.)

¶18

L^->* ^5

¶19

.^^.^

¶20

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE CONSTITUTIQN OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN NATURE OF MANDAMUS CERTIORARY OR ANY OTHER WRIT OF LIKE NATURE ETC.

¶21

A-.^	•T5E1 •<tIW'tl, tTrl'y'>t^, fart tiiydl sbli°h.CO.{-s'...??./.^..S.....	wy J7
	StK^Tlsffidiqi^p^)
31R»?BIIti-tl* wnsn^i!	?CTISR^f	B3n^t
	S. B.: HQr LESHRI PRITINK 07.01.2015:	ER DIWAKER. J.
	ShriAshwaniShukla.court ShriAjitSingh, Panel Law4 No.1 to4. : The substantive post ofth( Teacher and vide order dated was given the assignment of C	atClusterCenter, Kurda. Challenge in the present 22.12.2014 (Annexure P/1)whe

¶22

aioOd )j^»IW1, WIgI- FS/I-7/2014-2.00.000.

¶23

^-ocl rt4|qirtq »Ti1'M'l(,, Rdl'y^

¶24

•'•sasfvs-fm ,^3-^^ 't^-.^^ "vl, s ^ '•-. a t ' . 7 ''<<l.'^. L'a.-.sy' .. ^ ^'

¶25

TTTO^TT 5WR).C^;&../^./.AS'......:..^R

¶26

¶27

sii^i Jf3 (*yF^si<{y)

¶28

|311^1qilR-li«h
TWT^1^5h*<|^aifER^ifitTOT^r
/.^.|'hl'lll'ri^.ltlWrit-8fel.il <R|<<-1<
^isiRrosii^f| |---|---|---| |i-|In viewofabove, the pe
this petition with the aforesaj
filing
a
detailed
representa
respondent No.2/Gollector, it
to decide thesame as expe(
within
four
weeks
from
ttj
representation in accordancej
It is made clear thatt
anything on merits ofthecas^
liberty to decide ttie represen|(itioner is permitted to withdraw
d liberty. In the eventuality of
fon
by the
petitioner
before
|s expected from the Collector
(itiously as possible preferably
e
date
of
receipt
of
such
with law.
this Court hasnotobserved
and the Collector would be at
^tion strictly inaccordancewith| ||law.
I|'
Sd/-
PritinkerDiwakar
Judge|

¶29

¶30

Jagdish Prasad Shukla v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jagdish Prasad Shukla v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.K. Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Urmila Dhruv Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Shekhar Kumar Guha and 36 Ors. Vs M.D.Ibp.Co.Ltd.and Ors.

Smt. Suman Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

R.n. Pandey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Smt. Vimla Bharadwaj Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.