The High Court disposed of the writ petition after both parties filed a compromise. The respondent was ordered reinstated without back-wages, and the earlier Industrial Court order was affirmed as per the settlement terms.
Respondent to be reinstated in service without back-wages; earlier Industrial Court order affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFGHHAT'nSGARHATBILASPURfC.G. WRIT PETITION fL) N0^3i OF 2008
Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation, through: Divisional —Manager, C.I.D.C. Parivahan Prabhag,
PETITIONER
NON-APPLICANT
°^^^C.I.D.C. ^SP1-'" Raipur (C.G,).
VERSUS
RESPONDENT Nand Kishore Sharma, aged about APPLICANT 35 years, Son of Chhagan Lal Sharma, Resident of Badhaipara, Raipur (C.G.).
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
^w.
L'l^
LOKADALAT
Chhattisgarh High Court Campus. Bilaspur
}\u
W.P.fL^ No.71 of 2008
PETITIONER
Chhatdsgarh Infrastructure Development
Corporation (C.I.D.C.), Raipur
Versus
RESPONDENT
Nand Kishore Sharma
For Petitioner Shri Avinash Mishra, Standing Counsel of CIDC with Shri Bhupendra Shukla, Divisional Manager, CIDC (Transport Incharge), Raipur.
For Respondent
Respondent in person.
AWARD
f Passed on 12-09-2015)
(1) The parties have filed compromise petition.
(2) By way of compromise, both the parties, the petidoner and the respondent - Nand Kishore Sharma, have agreed that respondent shall be given reinstatement in service without back-wages which is acceptable to the respondent.
(3) Both the pardes to the dispute have also agreed upon that they shall not challenge the order of reinstatement of the respondent and the respondent, in turn, shall also not challenge the non-granting of back-wages, before any fomm or Court of Law.
(4) In view of compromise entered into between the parties, Ae writ petition stands disposed of and the orders dated 19.09.2007 passed by the Industrial
Court, Raipur, in Civil Appeal No. 48/C.G.I.R.Act/A/ll/2007 is hereby
affirmed. The Respondent shall be reinstated inservice without back-wages.
(5) It is also brought to the notice of the Fomm that the respondent is already in employment by vtrtue of order passed by the Industrial Court. Therefore, the period of service shall also be taken into consideration for computing the length of service of the petitioner.
(6) The writ petition stands accordingly disposed of.
).
Sd//-
InderSinghUboweja
Judge
Judge - Lok Adaiat High Courf of ChnaiSisgarh Bi.u^pur (C.G.)
Sd/-
Bilaspur (C.Q.)
?.
jiiEni
^.-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition under Article 227 should be decided on merits or disposed of via compromise petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation
Nand Kishore Sharma
Inder Singh Loveja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
