This is a one-line order where the Writ Petition under Article 226 was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner's grievance was stated to have been already addressed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CL^ (2^7.
@@^^^3!'?R y
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT
BILASPUR fC.G.1
WRIT PETITION fS) N0. ^/-T OF 2009
PETITIONER
3^^
^^f5r^
...<^^-^
'^
<»"
^^•-"
RESPONDENTS 1.
Janardan Rai Son of Late Shri Seetaram Rai, aged about 67 years, Retired Deputy Ranger, C/o Shri K. K. Rai, Lecturer, Bauripara Shikari Road, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.).
VERSUS
State of Chhattisgarh, through: the Secretary, Department Qf Forest, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.).
f^-f^'^^fl ^ 1
I^^J^i.^j
i^'<Py ^^
The Divisional Forest Officer, Manendragarh Forest Division, Manendragarh, District Koriya (C.G.).
The Senior Account Officer, Accountant General Office, Pandri, Raipur (C.G.).
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION
OF INDIA
^>
'.\ '^
1
sl1
-•>;..';.—^.--^-i
£S€^A
7^^^
-^sfi ^mr^s, srfteTC, 'wiv^
•nirapff -aTO<?> .t^£.CSC)..^.....^?'^
anifff XR^ (^pt^^i)
^raferat^ -iva^i -ff fs^ tfa^K
.ill^^I ^w
^, itta'q sn^i
Ti'insfl^i anN'
—^
S.B.: Hoa'ble Mr. Justiee N.
10.04.2014
Mr. T.R. Chaadrakar, C<J unsel for the petitioner.
Mr. Majid AU, Paael Law^er for the State.
Mr. K. Shakeel, Counsel|for respondent No.3.
Mr. Chaadrakar subijiits fhat fhe
petitioner's
grievaace has already been re^ressed aud fhe petition has
now become infructuous.
In view of the above sutijmissioa, the writ petition is
dismissed as havmg become ijifi-uctuous. No order as to
costs. 1 ' - —---
Sd/-
N.K. Agarwal
Judge
^^
Janardan Rai
State of Chhattisgarh
N.K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
