Petitioner sought promotion. Court held petition infructuous due to petitioner's promotion pending litigation and allowed further representation for consequential benefits.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; representation permitted for consequential benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
w@
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, AT-BILASPUR WRIT PETITION S NO. éé§6 OF 2009
PETITIONER
S. L. BAGHEL,
AGED —- 50 YEARS, ‘ S/O SHRI RAM LAL BAGHEL, POSTED AS— LECTURER IN HISTORY, AT— GOVT. HIGH SCHOOL, LAKHOLI, BLOCK— ARANG, DISTT.‘ —‘- RAIPUR (C. G.) R/O VILLAGE —- GUJARA, P. O. — REWA, BLOCK— ARANG, DISTT.— RAIPUR (C. G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS : I 1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH—ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MANTRALAYA,D. K. S. BHAWAN, RAIPUR
THE COMMISSIONER,
PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONDIRECTORATE, H. Q.- RAIPUR (C. G.)
SHRI G. L. BAMBESHWAR,
PRINCIPAL, GOVT.HIGHSCHOOL, THAKURTOLA, CHHUIKHADAN, '— DISTRICT RAJNANDGAON (C.G.)
Writ Petition underArticle—226ofthe
Constitution of India.‘
mm,m,m
@
mar mmPwméazé/ v1 200%
anéw mm (W)
mmm amma urna‘f ’ fEQ“! VFW
WWW
mm és a‘f‘aq eFm;
HON'BLE MR. N.K.AGARWAL, J
10.04.2014
Shri R.K.Kesharwani, co nsel for the petitioner.
Shri Bhaskar Payashi, P. . for the State.
In view of the fact that du ing the pendency of the petition, the
petitioner has already been pr o. oted, Shri Kesharwani, counsel for
the petitioner submits that this p atitien has now become infructuous.
In view of above, the pei ition is disposed of as having been
rendered infructuous. However, petitioner is free. to me
representation for consequentie i benefits in case he is entitled for
‘ces
that, in the facts and circumstan of the case.
Sd}.
l/
N . K Agarwa‘
.
hldge
/
S. L. Baghel
State of Chhattisgarh
N.K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
