Dismissed

C.G. Infrastructure Dev.Corp. v. Chandra Bahadur Singh

Chhattisgarh HC6 Dec 2014WPL/1038/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition was disposed of in a Lok Adalat where the parties amicably settled the dispute. The petitioner agreed to retain the respondent as a regular employee upon his relinquishing claims for back wages.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of on terms of settlement: petitioner to retain respondent as regular employee in lieu of claim for back wages.

C.G. Infrastructure Dev.Corp. Vs Chandra Bahadur… — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

’ IN THE HONBLE H IGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR c.G. WRIT PETITION (L) No.1 03 8 12008

¶2

IN THE MATTER OF
3‘ BETWEEN :
PETITIONER : / Chhattisgarh Infrastructure
Development Corporation, Raipur,
’0P?E LLg—nrr
Ma Chhattisgarh, through it’s Divisional
2€' Manager (Transport Section), Raipur,
Chhattisgarh
“Ag.
o R_N0""”"Ml:
h¥§a “V.........
gVQ f
‘g‘esegta‘x y VERsus
WMM
RESPONDENTS : / ShriChandra BahadurSingh
REsYoAmENv S/o Not known to the petitioner, Ex-'
/ 'K
Driver, Madhya Pradesh State Road
}g.v'
Transportation (now CIDC), resident
of Pandari Tarai, Gandhi Nagar,
Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶3

WRIT PETITION UN DER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A PPROPRIATE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND FOR ISSUANCE OF OTHER SUITABLE WRITS, DIRECTION OR D IRECTIONS, ORDER OR ORDERS

¶4

¶5

¶6

NATIONAL^{LOK ADALT} DATED^{—06DECEMEER;2014’}

¶7

CHHATTISGARH^{HIGHCOURT'CAMPUS-zBILASPUR}

¶8

Case No.^WP. (L)^No. 1038/2008

¶9

Chhattisgarh^{Infrastructure} :— Development^Corporation, Raipur.

¶10

Petitioner

¶11

Versus

¶12

Shri Chandra^BahadurSingh

¶13

Shri Chandra^Bahadur R s ent :- Shri M.M.^{Singh,DivisionalAccountOfficer,onbehalfofpetitioner.}

¶14

AWARD

¶15

(Passed^{onthis6‘“December2014} )

¶16

The contesting parties to this petition have amicably is subject^{matterofthispetition} settled/compromised^{thedispute,which} voluntarily. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement^{arrivedatbetweenthecontestingpartiesarejust,} legal^{andhenceareacceptable,weaccordinglyacceptthe} proper^and compromise/settlement,^{proposedbytheparties.}

¶17

In the instant petition,^the petitioner/Corporation^and respondent /employee have entered into a settlement on account of which, petitioner/Corporation^{agreeduponretainingtherespondentasaregular} employee^{ofthecorporationonaconditionthattheemployeeinturnshall} forgo his^{claimforbackwages.}

¶18

Accordingly,^the instant petition is disposed of on the^assurance by the Department for providing regular employment to the given respondent,^{theinstantpetitionisdisposedof.} /

¶19

/-\ /»/ i Sd/— i Member^{—Lok Adalat} , High Court^{ofChhattisgarh} Bilaspur

¶20

Sd/— P. Sam Koshy ”Judge a Lok Adaiat , High Court^{ofChhattisgarh} Bilaspur

C.G. Infrastructure Dev.Corp. v. Chandra Bahadur Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.G. Infrastructure Dev.Corp. v. Chandra Bahadur Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Assistant Engineer, C.S.E.B. Vs Laxmi Kumar Chandra

Ashok @ Mirchi Tiwari Vs State of Chhattisgarh

National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Ganga Ram and Others

Chhattisgarh Infra. Deve. Cor. Vs Bharat Das Vaishnav and Ors.

Jagdish Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

C.G. Infrastructure Dev. Cor. Vs D. Chennaiha and Anr.