Disposed

Prathmik Upbhokta Sah.Bhandar and Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC4 Dec 2014WPC/2694/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition by two cooperative societies seeking to challenge the cancellation of their Fair Price Shop licenses via Collector's order. The court dismissed the petition and directed the petitioner to file a representation before the Collector within one month.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners are directed to prefer a representation before the concerned Collector within one month from today.

Prathmik Upbhokta Sah.Bhandar and Anr. Vs State of… — Consumer Protection | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

%i,:

¶2

C^P^!^ ^ ^

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B ILA S PU R^C^G.1

¶4

WRIT PETITION (Q NO;.W<./...^.,.20Q7 (Smgle Bench, Civil Matter)

PETITIONERS : 1.

^0)^-<br>...<^y^^>

PRATHMIK UPBHOKTA SAHKARI BHANDAR SANCHALAK SANGH. (Regd. No. 4049) Regd. Office- Street 37, Qtr. No.5/E, Zone-2, Khursipar, Bhilai-490011 (C.G.) Th'ough- Secretary (Shn Budlian Thakiir) jF_^b"^e adc^-rps^ JAI HANUMAN PRATHMIK UP BtIANDAR, Ward No. 22, Camp-1, Adarsh Nagar, Bhilai (Regd. No. 2625) Through- President o- s cv'bo v e ^ cJciwj^ (Shri Kamla Yadav)

¶9

VERSUS

¶10

RESPONDENTS -1. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH,

¶11

Through- Principal Secretary,

¶12

Food & Civil Supply & Consumer Protection Department,

¶13

Govt. ofC.G.,Mantralaya,

¶14

D.K.S. Bhawan, RAIPUR (C.G.)

¶15

^•i,i ?7TT^' "ri'i '?.A^-.f ^y''-. ;MRS?'?i:'Ti.WT ?i?^S;??""S>a^^

¶16

THE COLLECTOR (Food Branch) Diu-g, Tah. & Distt. Durg (C.G.) MARUTINANDAN Sahakari Up Bhandar Maryadit, Tat Patti Colony, Camp-l,Bhilai, Tah. & Distt. DURG (C.G.)

¶17

Through- President.

¶18

PETITIONER UNDER ARTICLES 226 OF THE

¶19

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA

¶20

Particulars of the petitioners:-

fr-

·^^

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR

¶25

W.P.rc)No.2694of2007

¶26

PETITIONERS Prathmik Upbhokta Sahkari Bhandar

¶27

Sanchalak Sangh & another

¶28

Versus

¶29

RESPONDENTS State of Chhattisgarh & others.

¶30

Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar h/lishra

¶31

Present:Shri V.G. Tamaskar, counsel for the petitioners. Shri Ashutosh Pandey, PL for the State.

¶32

^^.

¶33

^.^'l|Iy8eyi'yh'"ttTis4th(aay!'a£|p)|ym§!igr,2014)

¶34

yeS^jiiamed counsel for the parties. %s

¶35

sflflypetitioner is aggrieved^bgcitae order Annexure P-6 lexure P-8

¶36

whereby the'Col]ec^i;,|gtirgSI-tas|]E{uceated the consumers^fTair Price

¶37

Shop of the petitionertdi^gJJR^^fend a new licensee has been alloted the Fair Price Shop of al6|l'8ij^d|p.

¶38

There is no interim orclpiBytB|ssg8yrt. The writ petition is pending since v- last about 7 years. ''v^^^'.M'W

¶39

If the arrangement ifflSSfRcgffigiuing, the petitioner may prefer a representation before the concerned Collector within a period of one month from today. If the representation is filed, the Collector shall

¶40

consider and decide the same in accordance with law and on its own merits.

¶41

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶42

ASHU

¶43

Sd/prashantKumarMishra Judge

Prathmik Upbhokta Sah.Bhandar and Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prathmik Upbhokta Sah.Bhandar and Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anuj Kumar Bhargav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Khagendra Manhar Vs Ramji Kurrey and Ors.

Prakash Pandey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Shiv Pratap Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Virendra Kumar Gujjar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Amarnath Sahu And Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.