Dismissed
Virendra Kumar Gujjar v. State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWPC/2356/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WW Mm
@
=| THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF CHHATI'ISGARH AT BILASPUR 2 3<3é; w.p. © No
w.p. © No
../2014
‘1o Virendra Kumar Gujjar, Aged about 42 years, S/o:- Niresh Ram Gujjar, R/o:- College Road, Navapara, Surajpur, TahsH & District— Surjpur, CG.
PETITIONER
ll I)
< rn W C
RESPONDENTS
6‘ 1/.$tate of Chhattisgarh,
Through- Secretary, Department of Revenue and Digester Management, Mantralaya, Dau Kalyan Singh ...’ Bhawan, Raipur, (Now), Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur C.G. a 2. State of Chhattisgarh
:— Commissioner, Division‘ Sarjuga, C.G. /‘Fhrough 3. State of Chhattisgarh
Through :- Collector, District— Surjpur, C.G. 4/Sub Divisional Magistrate Tahsil— Bhaiyathan (Newly Constituted), Districte Surajpur, C.G.
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF lNDlA
3a mam, whims, Mgr
mum mw.>l§Q .ftsttflm201
| mmmgfgwl) |
|
|---|---|
| mmw ‘ WWW |
mmwm Wmm‘w1%2§m %ai1?man%¥l |
| tKumar Mishra .forthe petitioner. . he State, SB. Hon’blevShri Justice Prashan 4—12-2014 Shri Hemant Gupta, counsel Shri S. Rathore, Dy. GA fort Learned counsel for the petitioner‘seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to tite a duly constituted WP (PIL). Prayer allowed. Accordingly the writ petitio 1 is dismissed as withdrawn with |
|
| liberty aforesaid. Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Sd/— |
|
| :» mumv. m «NA». s, .dwwmaw, ‘ v v |
e-.._~".,, w . u rut M «yaw, , |
Virendra Kumar Gujjar
State of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court