Kanker Roadways v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC5 Sept 2014WPC/1747/2014

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

HKGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WRIT…

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Kanker Roadways Vs State Transport Appellate… — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶13

m a m m m a f g w x )	a WW§WW
m a t a f é ‘ a m	% 3 ? R m m
B : H o n ’ b l e S h r i M a n i h d r a M S o 5 . 9 . 2 0 1 4 S h r i S h a i l e n d r a K u m a r B a j S h r i S i d d h a r t h R a t h o d , D ' a d v a n c e c o p y . H e a r d o n a d m i s s i o n . T h e p e t i t i o n e r b y t h i s p e t i t i	n S h r i v a s t a v a J a . a i , c o u n s e l f o r t h e p e t i t i o n e r , . G o v t . A d v o c a t e f o r t h e S t a t e , o n n h a s p r a y e d f o r a d i r e c t i o n t o m o d i f y
o r d e r d a t e d 1 . 5 . 2 0 1 4 a n d d i r e c t p e t i t i o n e r . L e a r n e d c o u n s e l f o r t h e p e t	t i o n e r s u b m i t s t h a t i n t h e e a r l i e r r o u n d i s s u a n c e o f . p e r m i t i n f a v o u r o f t h e
a n d t h e p e t i t i o n e r h a s b e e n n o r e a s o n f o r r e j e c t i o n o f p e t i t i o n e w h i c h w a s n o t u p h e l d b y t h e r e m a i n s n o t h i n g t o b e ‘ e x a m i n d e l a y i n g t h e m a t t e r . 1 . 5 . 2 0 1 4 , h a s o b s e r v e d t h a t s u c o n d i t i o n s f o r g r a n t o f p e r m i t , t h e p e r m i t o n t h e r o u t e a s p e r t h e t o f l i t i g a t i o n , t h e p e t i t i o n e r h a d a c c o r d i n g t o t h e p e t i t i o n e r a l l n e c o f p e r m i t a s a p p l i e d w e r e m a d e d i r e c t i n g i s s u a n c e o f p e r m i t , r e m a s u b m i t s t h a t t h e s p i r i t o f t h e o r d a u t h o r i t y t o i s s u e p e r m i t t o t h e T h i s C o u r t , w h i l e d i s p o s i p i	f i l e d p e t i t i o n b e c a u s e e v e n t h o u g h e s s a r y c o n d i t i o n r e q u i r e d f o r i s s u a n c e o u t , t h e a p p e l l a t e C o u r t ) i n s t e a d o f t i o n e r , b u t t h e p e r m i t w a s n o t i s s u e d c e d f o r h e a r i n g . T h e o n l y o p e r a t i v e ’ s a p p l i c a t i o n w a s p r o x i m i t y o f t i m e o f f t h e p e t i t i o n y i d e o r d e r d a t e d j e c t t o f u l f i l l m e n t o f o t h e r s t a t u t o r y e t i t i o n e r w o u l d b e e n t i t l e d t o g r a n t o f r i b u n a l i t s e l f . T h e r e f o r e , n o w t h e r e b u t t h e a u t h o r i t y i s u n n e c e s s a r y e t a b l e p r o p o s e d b y t h e petitioner. n d e d t h e m a t t e r f o r i n q u i r y . H e f u r t h e r e r p a s s e d b y t h i s C o u r t r e q u i r e d t h e 1 l

¶16

W W W	m m v a a a n é a . 4 2 ” , -	m m w m a a x a i w m
	T h e r e f o r e , t h e c o m p e t e n t a u t h o r i t y ( o n l y t o v e r i f y w h e t h e r t h e s t a t u t o r y V l f t h e “ p e t i t i o n e r h a s f u l f i H e d t h e r e q u i r e d t o - b e p a s s e d 1 t a p p e a r s i a p p e a r i n a n y f u r t h e r p r o c e e d i n g a u t h o r i t y s h o u l d p r o c e e d t o p a s s e l a w w i t h i n a p e r i o d o f t h r e e w e e k s T o r d e r , . W i t h t h e a f o r e s a i d o b s e r v a t i c	n s , t h e p e t i t i o n i s f i n a l l y d i s p o s e d o f f . i s r e q u i r e d t o s c r u t i n i z e t h e r e c o r d s c o n d i t i o n s h a v e b e e n f u l f i l l e d o r n o t c o n d i t i o n s , n e c e s s a r y o r d e r s a r e t h a t t h e p e t i t i o n e r i s n o t i n c l i n e d t o i s i n t h e m a t t e r . i f t h a t i s s o , t h e p p r o p r i a t e o r d e r s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h r o m t h e d a t e o f r e c e i p t o f c ‘ o p y o f t h i s
Praveen		S d / - M a n i n d r a M o h a n S h r i v a s t a v a J u d g e

Kanker Roadways v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Kanker Roadways v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkishor Agrawal Vs Kareliya Bai dead Through Lrs Shyamlal Araksak and Ors.

Sarvoday Harijan Fisheries Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs Dheemer Fishereies Co-operative Society Ltd. and Anr.

Hiten Kothari Vs Kishor Kumar Somayya

Manmohan Thakur Vs South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. And Ors.

M/s Balaji Food and Packers Vs Municipal Corporation Raigarh And Ors.

Premdhar And Ors. Vs Lekhram And Ors.