Case admitted on a date but not disposed of in this judgment. Text indicates only that the petitioner is to submit an application for orders to be passed after issuing notice. No legal principle, reasoning, or disposal is articulated in the provided text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HON'BLE HI6H COURT OF CHHATn:S6ARH AT BILASPUR
W.P. (227)N0. £'3 ^ / 2014
Petitioner
Sarvoday Harijan Fisheries
(N.A.No.2)
Co-operative Society Ltd., Kathiya
,^
..<'S!^
.•-^1'.^'
sy
,»y><1:.""
^••"
Through- President Bhikam &ilhare S/o Shri Samay Das Gilhare, Aged about 50 years, ft/o Village Kathiya No.2, Police Station, Tahsil & Block Abhanpur, Civil & Revenue District - Raipur-(C.G.)
Versus
Respondents 1.
bheemer Fisheries Co-operative
(Applicant No.l)
Society Ltd., Kathiya No.2
Through - President Ram Kumar
Tarak, Aged about 50 years,
R/o Village Kathiya, Potice Station, Tahsil <&, Block - Abhanpur, Civil &
Revenue t)istrict-Raipur-(C.G.)
(Non-Applicant No.-l) 2.
6ram Panchayat Kathiya
Through- Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat
Kathiya No.2, Post - Kathiya No.2, P.5., Tahsil <& Block - Abhanpur, Civil <&
Revenue District- Raipur-(C.6.)
•st>
liiSB'l-^TRi ns^sy-;!1.3-...—
WRTT PETITEON UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTCTUnON
OF INDIA
•^i
^"^s
^-•';y ^iS?,..?'~<?i •?;;, "^
l' ^ N, v Xl-HC—78
'
^•^"a's^y -% ^. . ^? .^Ji
3^9•qrai?ra, yTl1wi<?, ^oiitiy
wwrr 5OTT^l^.|pC.^^£3^1..^20i
sn^r qsffi (^^^p)
|sn^^iiR-ii*
cWTSll^sb+li*|?snw^fei sn^g|qil«Frt<Ilt*ll«rtI'91S'<fl<rj|<<il<
^i3iRlK3II^(|
|---|---|---|
|£.|B; Hon'bteShri Manimira Mohar
Shri C..R. Sahu, counsdfor t
Heard onadmision.
Learned roureel for the De
p'oceedings in respect o
an end, vide order dated 14/12QO
operative Society, Rai[air, the CorT
taking into roreideration that the p
andtherefore, notentitledtogrant01
The order pasai by the
petitioner failed to produce any
Iquidation proceedin^. Tha'e is ra
bsfore the Commissioner. Howevert
This aspect was not consider^
petitioner may submit an ap^icatior)
appr<vi'iateorders afterissuing noti^
Thepetitioneaccordingiydi^
14/120011 passsl bytheJpintR^i
steted ttiatan order dated 14/12QOI
thls fact and thereafter, the Cof|i
|iepditioner.
Woner submte thateven thQuah the
tnissioner has dismjssed the revisjon,
^ttioner socidy was under liquidation
s
the petitionersociety were broughtto
1 (sseci by ths JoinS Registrar, Co-
lease.
pommisaoner cteariy stats that the
Bocument wtth n
closure of
averment maie that th&order dated
sfrar Co-operativeSocidywas pla;ed
in the memo of revision.it has been
11 had been fited beforethe Cdlector.
|?y fhe Commissioner, therefore, the
beforetheCommissioner pointing oyt
timissioner shali corBider arei pass
totheotherparti®.|
't>
Sarvoday Harijan Fisheries Co-operative Society Ltd.
Bheemer Fisheries Co-operative Society Ltd.
Gram Panchayat Kathiya
HR HON'BLE SHRI MANIMURA MOHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
