Dismissed

Ramkishor Agrawal v. Kareliya Bai dead Through Lrs Shyamlal Araksak and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC4 Sept 2014WP227/643/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This was a writ petition under Articles 226/227 seeking appointment of a receiver over property unauthorizedly occupied by respondents. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that no case was made out for interference as the petitioners had failed to demonstrate imminent injury or serious prejudice. The application was rejected by the lower court, and the High Court found no ground to act.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed; no appointment of receiver made.

Ramkishor Agrawal Vs Kareliya Bai dead Through… — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶2

OF 2014.

¶3

W. P. (2271 No. ^ 4 ^

¶4

RamKishor Agrawal

¶5

PETITIQNER (•^^ii

¶6

S/o Late Shri Madho Prasad Agrawal, aged about 55 years, R/o Vill-Nirtu, Police StationSeepat, Tahsil-Masturi, Civil & Revenue District-Bilaspur(C.G.) At Present R/o Vill-Akaltara, Police Station 8s -TahsilAkaltara, Civil & Revenue District-Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)

¶7

^lA ^
A'-i'..•••'cy-7'" ...-'...
,^^
s^y..'^>".-&^
^>-"'

¶8

Y E RSUS

¶9

RESPONDENTS e>*fv^i^s

¶10

: Kareliya Bai (Deid) Through LRs

¶11

¶12

Shyamlal Araksak,

¶13

S/o Late Shri SevakRam Patel, aged about -60 years, R/o VillDharseeva, Police StationDharseeva, Civil 85 Revenue District-Raipur(C. G.)

¶14

¶15

Basant

¶16

S/o Shri< Shyamlal Patel, a£ed about- 35 years,

¶17

¶18

Pyare

¶19

S/o Shri Shyamlal Patel, aged about- 33 years,

¶20

¶21

Pankaj

¶22

S/o Shri Shyamlal Patel, aged about- 30 years,

¶23

't<

¶24

•<;-

¶25

All R/o Vill-Nirtu, Police Station-Seepat, Tahsil-Masturi, Civil 85 Revenue DistrictBilaspurfC.G.)

¶26

State of Chhattisgarh, Through fhe District Magistrate Bilaspur (C.G.)

¶27

L WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 3S6/227 OF THE CONSTITUTIONOF INDIA

¶28

•-••<,

¶29

¶30

•\ -:.^ g ^I-HC—78 'SSSSf-'' xy / ^^ ;'A\° '•

¶31

'Sssf ^wi^,w^wii,, Rtctwy

¶32

WWIT 3wr^.Li.f?^2^.^?..<<.^3.^ 201 -9

¶33

¶34

gn^iqsR; ('itlyqp)

¶35

3II^[^ilR-li+
<TOT3II§!»*tli<ti

¶36

^snw^Bsn^'	*iyld<fl-ltiltitfl'SIS'<J1 <Rl<<ii< ^isiRmsii^i
SB :Hon'bleShriManindra IVIo 4.9.2014 Shri P. M. Shrivas, counsel ShriAdil Minhaj, Panel Lav Heard. ,	lan Shrivastava, J, forthe petitioner. yerforthe State.
This petition under Articlf preferred agairist order dated application forappbintment of Re Learned counsel for the pe a suit for recovery of possession unauthorizedely occupied. He sul to enjoy the property by keeping seriously prejudiced. Aftergoing though the app	227 of the Constitution of India is 2.8.2014 by which the petitioner's ;eiver has been rejected. titioner submits that the petitioner filed of property on which defendants have imits that if the defendants are allowed it in. posses'sion, the petitionerShall be ication filed by the petitioner before the
Court below and the submissions Court, no case for appointment stated in the application for ap	: have in any manner acted so somethrng which is likely to serii the property or imminent injury c .therefore rightly rejected the appli No case .for interference is The petition is dismissed.

¶37

Ramkishor Agrawal v. Kareliya Bai dead Through Lrs Shyamlal Araksak and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramkishor Agrawal v. Kareliya Bai dead Through Lrs Shyamlal Araksak and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Ambey Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Basnajhar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Smt.kamlesh Shukla Vs South Eastern Coal Field Ltd. And Ors.

Dharamcharan Panda and Anr. Vs Suresh Kumar and Ors.

Sarvoday Harijan Fisheries Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs Dheemer Fishereies Co-operative Society Ltd. and Anr.

Hiten Kothari Vs Kishor Kumar Somayya

Tilak Singh And Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.