Dismissed

Tilak Singh And Anr. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC4 Sept 2014WPC/1649/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the non-service of notice regarding vacancies. The court held that since an alternative remedy under the CG Panchayats (Appeal and Revision) Rules 1995 was existent, the petition based on procedural impropriety under Article 226 was not entertained.

What did the court decide?

The petition was fully disposed off dismissing the plea for issuance of appropriate writ order or directions.

Tilak Singh And Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh… — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2014)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR [C.G.] WRIT PETITION (C) N0. f LC}^(I /2014

¶3

PETITIONERS

¶4

1.Tilak Singh S/o Late Shri Shyam Singh, aged-about 50 years, Ex sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kalchha, Janpad Panchayat Udaipur, Distt.-Sarguja [C.G.}

¶5

Bharos Das S/o Late Tejrai das, aged— about 39 years Ex Secretary of Gram: Panchayat Kalchha, Janpad Panchaya; Udaipur, Distt.-Sarguja [C.G.] at preseni working as Sahayak Antrik Lekha Parikhsan evam Kararopan Adhikari, Janpad Panchayat-Udaipur, Distt.~Sarguja [C.G.]

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

RESPONDENTS

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh ThroughSecretary, Panchayat 8a Rural Development Department) , Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur [C.G.] 2. Sub Divisional Cfficer, Uadaipur, Distt.~Sarguja [C.G.] 3.Sub Divisional officer [Revenue], Ambikapur, Distt.-Sarguja [C.G.] 4. Tahsildar, Udaipur, Distt.-Sarguja [C.G.}

¶9

Chie f Executive officer, Janpad Panchayat-Udaipur, Distt.-Sarguja [C.G.] 6. Gram Panchayat, Kolchha, throughlts Sarpanch, Janpad Panchayat Udaipur, Distt.-Sarguja [C.G.]

¶10

WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE

¶11

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTIONS

¶12

wmm	‘Wm WW aiaifmanéil Ewanmm
Deepti	SB : Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mchan Shrivastava, J. 04-09—2014 Shri Sanjay Patel, counsel Ms._ Smlti Dubey, Dy‘Govt. Heath on admission. wThzvemohallenge is to thevac ion of the respondents in making re$&/ery from the petitioners in p rported exercise of powers under Section 92 ofthe CG Panchayat aj Adhiniyam, 1993. Number of grounds have b n raised in thispetition. However, considering that thereexisted alernative remedy, of filing appeal under the provisions of CG P nchayats (Appeal and Revisron) Rules 1995 and the case does ot relates to non compliance of prinCIples ^ofnatural Justice l am n t inclined to entertain this petition when there is an alternative re edy of filing appeal before the appellate authority? Learned counsel for the pe itioners prays that the petitioners may be granted stay. full power to grant interim order, it would be open for the petition the appellate authority. lf'prayer Vo'r interim order is made by the ded by the appellate authority the petitioner/e. v. for the State. As the appellate authority h e to pray for interim relief before petitioners, the same shall be within 15 days. V The petition is accordingly fi lly disposed off Sd/- . Manindra ^{Mohan Shrlvastava} Judge d r d i

wmm

‘Wm WW
aiaifmanéil
Ewanmm

Deepti

SB
: Hon’ble Shri Manindra Mchan Shrivastava, J.
04-09—2014
Shri Sanjay Patel, counsel
Ms._ Smlti Dubey, Dy‘Govt.
Heath on admission.
wThzvemohallenge
is
to thevac ion
of the respondents
in making
re$&/ery from the petitioners
in p
rported exercise of powers under
Section 92 ofthe CG Panchayat
aj Adhiniyam, 1993.
Number of grounds have b
n raised in thispetition. However,
considering
that
thereexisted
alernative
remedy, of
filing
appeal
under
the
provisions
of CG
P
nchayats
(Appeal
and
Revisron)
Rules
1995
and
the
case
does
ot
relates
to
non compliance
of
prinCIples ^ofnatural Justice
l am n
t inclined to entertain this petition
when
there
is
an
alternative
re
edy
of
filing
appeal
before
the
appellate authority?
Learned counsel
for the pe itioners prays that the
petitioners
may be granted stay.
full power to grant interim order,
it would be open for the
petition
the
appellate
authority.
lf'prayer
Vo'r
interim
order
is made by the
ded
by
the
appellate
authority
the petitioner/e.
v. for the State.
As the appellate authority h
e
to pray
for interim
relief before
petitioners,
the
same
shall
be
within 15 days.
V
The petition is accordingly fi
lly disposed off
Sd/-
.
Manindra ^{Mohan Shrlvastava}
Judge
d
r
d
i

Tilak Singh And Anr. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tilak Singh And Anr. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Ambey Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Basnajhar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Smt.kamlesh Shukla Vs South Eastern Coal Field Ltd. And Ors.

Dharamcharan Panda and Anr. Vs Suresh Kumar and Ors.

Ramkishor Agrawal Vs Kareliya Bai dead Through Lrs Shyamlal Araksak and Ors.

Sarvoday Harijan Fisheries Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs Dheemer Fishereies Co-operative Society Ltd. and Anr.

Hiten Kothari Vs Kishor Kumar Somayya