Reshamlal and Ors. v. Lakeshari and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The judgment text appears to be a petition title and a fragmented order with significant OCR noise and absent substantive content. No parties, judges, issues, or decisions are legible.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR W.P.(227) N0. <Q ^iJ^/2014 PETITIONER 1. Reshamlal, S/o Bundram Satnami, (^t^lU-^-i fo » aged about 50 years, Rajkumar, S/o Bundram Satnami, ^:... aged about 47 years, »^' Both r/o village Kot, P.S. and Tahsil Kasdol, Revenue Distt . ^^ .A-^'''"" Balodabazar, Civil Distt. Raipur ••"^••"f.^.^•j%/^ Phool Bai, W/o Kuber Satnam±,D/o .*^" Shobharam, aged about 41 years, r/o village Boirdih, P.0. Khainda, Tahsil Balodabazar, Revenue Distt. Balodabazar, Civil Distt. Raipur (C.G.). Phooleshwari W/o Bhuneshwar Satnami, aged about 38 years,Village S Post Khainda, Tahsil Balodabazar, Revenue Distt. Balodabazar, Civil Distt. Raipur (C.G.).
Versus
RESPONDENTS
Lakeshari, D/o Kholbahara, aged about 35 years, Caste Satnami, r/o village Kot, P.S. S Tahsil Kasdol, Revenue Distt. Balodabazy, Civil Distt. Raipur (C.G.) . - -— ----.„--. - f&wiA:^ State of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector Balodabar, Revenue Distt. Balodabazar, Civil Distt. Raipur (C.G.). ._ . ,---. ^e^, Ma-A
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONERS As stated in the cause title.
^_
'S
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP227/624/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court