This is an application seeking restoration of Writ Petition No. 405/2001, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution. The High Court allowed the application for restoration.
M.C.C. No. 661/2013 is allowed and W.P. No. 405/2001 is restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THFHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ‘ gee.) ‘ M.c.c;”No. 66( OF @ wt; g§g¢gg§gg$Mw
, _ (Arisin'gtoutjof'Wci't‘PetitionNo.40512001)
APPLICANT
”Gupta Suryakant Agriculture Farm Rajaram Miaze Products, Village— Moha. District Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
L ‘VERSUS'
| Deputy Labour “Commissioner, Chhattisgarh, Raipur. |
|
|---|---|
| Presiding Officer, |
|
| -. :" |
H'Lébbr'Court (LD. Act), RajnandgaQn. |
| Baliyar S/o Sukharu, R/o Bhothipar, Post Haldi, |
|
| 1 a. : |
District, Rajnandgaon. ' |
| Ragba‘r s/o Bijhwar | |
| Minabai W/o Jagishran | |
| O)#QOOIU1K | Assim bai W/o Manuram |
| r |
Kamalnath S/o Manthir |
| ’ W | 'TKUVa'rbattibai W/o Hiraram ' > ‘Mohan |
| 9; | SlogGulab] |
| 10. | Tahalsingh S/o Gulab |
| 11. | Begum Bai W/o Shobharam |
| 12. | rDevvati bai w/o Chitragat Prasad ‘ |
| 1:31; |
:E3Sohab'ati'Bai w/o Rataniai |
| 14. |
r Gajanand S/o Baiiyar |
| 15‘ | Savitri baiW/o Omlal |
| 16. | Nathiya bai w/o Mohaniai |
| 1 Dhanbai w/o Motiram | |
| ' 1‘8; |
’ .Ta‘ru‘n bai w/o Mohaniai |
| 19. ’ |
Ramshi’ia baiW/o Shankar . |
| ‘R'ukhamani bai w/OLLekhram | |
| Kantibaiw/o Keshrinandan |
@
@f
7.34;.
Milnatin baiw/o Mansingh Anuguiya bai w/o Dhalchand SonéLoai w/o Sukalura‘m
[Domjnbaiw/lGanesh 'Amrika bai WO Ghasia
No. 4 to 38 c/o Baliyar S/o’ Sukharu, Bhothipar, Post Haldi, District Rajnandgaon
APPLICATION FOR RESTORATtogw/OF WRIT PETITION No. 4 05/2001 DT§A7IISSPD . . g}. FQRA ,_ WANT‘ OE..PROSECUTI0N VIDE 10.2011 ORDER DATED 9MW?
3E12mm, Wm, W a 20 13
Wm (W)
| ammm | mmmm | WW§WIfWR éwffaum |
|---|---|---|
| S B ' HON’BLE JUSTICE MR 07.03.2014 |
PRITINKER DIWAKER | |
| Heard on M.C.C. No. t restoration of W.P. No. 405/2 court vide order dated 21 .11 .1‘ For the reasons mentio allowed. Accordingly, M.C.C. No Shri Anup Majumdar, cc |
unsel for the applicant. for want of prosecution. ned in the application‘ the same is 661/2013 is allowed and W.P. No. 161/13, which is an application for 001 which was dismissed by this |
|
| 405/2001 is restored to its orig C.c. today. |
iinai number. Pritinker Diwaker Judge Sd/- |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for restoration of a writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution should be allowed.
Gupta Suryakant Agriculture Farm Rajaram Miaze Products
Deputy Labour Commissioner, Chhattisgarh, Raipur
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
