Smt.Savitri Devi v. Radheshyam Jaiswal
Case brief
What is this about?
€OURTOF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH…
What the court decided
IN TIffi mG €OURTOF JUDICATURE OF CHHATTISGARH ATBILASt'UR
B F.A. N0. ^j3 OF 2003
FmST CFVIL APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CODE OF CFVIL PROCEDURE
SMT.SAVITRI DEVI AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, WIDOW OF LATE SHRI HARISHCHANDRA JAISWAL, R/0. LIG-30, TILAK NAGAR, GUDmYARI, RAIPUR, TAHSFL & DISTRICT RAIPUR (C.G.).
APPELLANT/ </DEFENDANT
^%^-"
^^^y
.^^""^
o.^^^""'
^^!^' *w^>
A« A- ..•-'
VERSUS
RESPONDENT/ PLAINTIFF
RADHESHYAM.JAISWAL . ^> S/O.RAMPHERJAISWAL, n AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/0. ^ SAMTA COLONY, RAIPUR, TAHSIL & DISTRICT RAIPUR (C.G.).
FmSTCIVH. APPEAL UNDER SECTION 96 OFTHE CODE OF CFVIL PROCEDURE
'•i-,
--~V-iK'—7S
yii.iT ,^^'r^?, tirftfflR'. l?R7i-?T'F'
.2-..^.\Q^. '?PT
WST-n' ihWh" 21)
3)'^-?T 'J;<3i- ('{W^iT.iT) i
an?'-; 's'. TWV 'ST^'WS. TI^ sn^i ,f,'-r--i7,!.T i.w.f tf rgct fl^:;.r(
(TW w;?; ^t|r<i? •T: .yr^^ W'^
|Oe-OA-/4-
n'.
A.tiiMt- Q/30&AM
e-*^> •lu^°
^= o.pp^1^'^
\J_i^ ^t^A tati^ ^ .^1
E^L/gun^y, M^ ^e4'l
!~<br>!li &&a<-^v^a/ ^f ^f^3
^SuRtjujM'V ~—~~—..
:SdA
prlti"' rD,wafcer
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal under Section 96 CPC deserves to be decided on the merits or dismissed based on incomplete procedural details.
Whether the appellant satisfies the requirements of Section 96 CPC to set aside the decree below.
Whether the decree passed in the suit filed by the respondent should be sustained or set aside.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Savitri Devi
- respondent
Radheshyam Jaiswal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- FA/213/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court