Appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act dismissed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
INTHE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
F.!AA.N0.'' ? / 2003
APPELLANT
Bhagirathi Gupta S/o
Late Shri Ramadhar Gupta,
Aged about 35 years,
Occupation Provision 8s General Stores, R/o Village Aalikhunta, P.0. Achholi, Tehsil fii Thana Daondilohara,
District- Durg (Chhattisgarh)
VERSUS
RESPONDENT Kanchanbala Gupta W/o
^BhagirathiGupta,
^-^Agedabout31 yearsC/o v?--^ '.'•'.*,'• Rajesh Kumar Gupta, [.'•''.^Ss-'' R/o Mahesh Nagar, Sushnia ..-%^ Tehsil & District Rajnandgaon, .^.^'^^'
R/o Mahesh Nagar, Sushnia Sadan-5, Tehsil & District Rajnandgaon,
(Chhattisgarh)
^•:;:..^
Menioranduni ofAppeal U/s 28 ofthe Hindu Marriaee Act
BSiE.t
XfiHC—78
'...^.7
3^ET ni)|<q|<^<|, (STfl+l'Ko, Islc^KHy
€> \
F, A- No, A-Q4l/2-o63 vsmvw ^T^;----•---•••••---->"-/"---^20
3II^?T'q3I;R (ljc|f.l«j<^I)
311^1 ??'RFIR? ^iraferaN inwrf -if fe^ (Fai^K
TOIIW ^lfOT 311^1
?TSTT 5?n^r s»>^ICt> ^raifiiHsn^i
.<SL
S.B.: iNKEi
13.03.2014
None appears for the a|j^pellant, even jn the second
round.
in view of the above. this C|ourtQ is isft with no other option
but to dismss ttie appeal for want]of prosecution-
Accordingly, the appeal) is dismissed for vrant of
DrosecuSon
Sd/-
Pritinker Diwaker
Judge
w
Bhagirathi Gupta
Kanchanbala Gupta
Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
