Allowed
Sidhram Marar v. Lakesh Sahu and Anr.
Chhattisgarh HCMCC/199/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
am W mmwm mm§fg€mfm %aaimem?m PRITINKER…
What the court decided
AI extract
am W mmwm mm§fg€mfm %aaimem?m PRITINKER…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3a W, Wm W
"Lila. Wt 2{) (t!
Wm (W)
mmwm mm§fg€mfm am W %aaimem?m
S.B.: HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. PRITINKER DIWAKER 10.03.2014 Shri Vinay Singh, couns 31 for the appellant. Shri G.D.Vaswani, GA fc r the State/resp. No.2. Heard on M.C.C. No. 1 99/14, which is an application for restoration of F.A. No. 60/20n3 which was dismissed by this court vide order dated 25.02.1l . for want of prosecution. This is not opposed byt 1e State counsei. For the reasons mentiomed in the application, the same is allowed. Accordingly, M.C.C. No. 199/2014 is ailowed and F.A. No. 60/2013 is restored to its origin‘ai number. y Sdl— nker“Maker PrW! Judge ~1
Lila Wm
State
Justice Mr. Pritinker Diwaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court