A writ petition filed by Dhani Ram Sonjhari was dismissed on the ground that the petitioner had died in 2011, rendering the petition abated due to the failure of his legal representatives to appear after more than two years.
The writ petition was dismissed as it stands abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
c ?<\0€^
IN THE HIGH CQURTjQF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION N0. '°78^+- OF 2005
PETITIONER
Dhani Ram Sonjhari Aged About90 Years S/oLate Bhadur SonjUari, Occupation- <5howkidar at Bhojpuri Mafasya F'raichetra, R/o-Village-Bhojpuri, ThesUBilha Thana-Hirri, Distt. BUaspur (C.G.)
VERSUS
^- -. RESPONDENT
State of Chhattisgarh Through its Secretary Departm.ent of Fisheries, D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.)
-^^ CQllGGtOr Distt.Bflaspur (C.G.)
•rfO'^rcf'^ Pu'ector, Matasya Udyog, Raipur t^^^1"' .^S-Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
Deputy Director, Matasya Udyog, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)
BRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE SNSTITUTION OP INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF AN APPRQ@g[ATE WRIT IN THE NATORE OF MANDAMUS / CERTIORARI ET^. OR DIRECTION / ORDER IN THE LIKENATORE.
o^ ^2^^^-' .^ DETAILS OF THE PETITION >-'"*'-.---^"^••'-""'""'L1 v^^1 ^MSW-/"'" ...f.-'Tc?^ 1. PARTICULARS OF THE PETITIONER Aated ^rf^7 As mentioned in the cause title above.
?$
wW yiriaaJllLl
^s? ^ITS'i^R,. '^;?n?<i^, T5;<?nIT[TT
^f f^o- ^?^/or
-• ^^s^-^y^-.^SJ^^^.
:SJ%W x^'^i' <''siSff^NS'^'ih.'"-.S " \ ~
EisisteaR WH?S 'S WS tfSr^R
iwwate »it?i
^- SRiH SiF^I
S.B.: Hoa'ble Mr. Justlce A^arwal
04.12.2013
1
Mr. Anshuman Shjjivastava, Couasel for fhe
petitioner.
Mr. Majid AU, Panel La^vyer for fhe State.
Mr. Shrivastava submijts fhat the petitioner has died
inthe year 2011.
Smce fhe Legal Re^ireseutatives of deceased -
petitioner are not brought ori record after a period ofinore
fhaii 2 years also, fhe writ pejtition staads abated.
In view of fhe above, tlj.e writ petifion staads abated
and is accordingly disinissedj
Sd/-
N.K. Agrawaj
Judge
shvna
•^t,.
iai<i<fi4^3n^^uil^<,^l-atli«ilitf—TS/4»—</20E2<—80,000.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioner can be maintained after his death.
Whether the writ petition stands abated due to the death of the petitioner without legal representatives appearing.
Dhani Ram Sonjhari
State of Chhattisgarh
N.K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
