Writ petition for service benefits merged with earlier petition. Court directed State to decide fresh representation within one month and grant benefit of pay if arrears paid.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| g THE HIGH COUm OF JUDICATURE AT JABALPUR. WRIT |
|---|
| PETITION no. $ W1 1 [1998 |
| (Service Matter) |
| l. Madhya Pradesh Takniki Matsyodhyog adhikari sangh Raipur. Branch Rajnandgaon, through its President. |
| . SHRI A.K. TIWARJT. S/o late Shri Gm. Tiwari. Med abouE 43 years; Fishirie’s' Extension Officer, Office of District Fish Ramers Develap'menl: Agency Rajnatidgaon (ILP. ) |
| 3. SHRI PRA‘I‘AP Yma‘ii, s/o'late Shri Paraéram Yadav.‘ L.D.C., in the office of District Fisli Farmers Development Agency Rajnanééaon (M.P.) 46 years. ’ PETITIONERS |
| XEjSUS |
| The State of Madhya Pradesh, ‘I‘fxrough Secretary' Fishiries Department Government of Madhya §radesh, Vallabh Bhawan Bhopal (M.P.) |
| Director of Fishiries. ébvernment of Madhya Pradesh, Vallébh Bhawan Bhoipal‘ ' ‘ |
"
| {gitx |
' |
MM |
|---|---|---|
| W | IWFMIOWW‘SmmiT .“A;€ 03.12 2013 Shrl Mano; K Smha co Shn M P S Bhatua Dep State/respondents No.1 to 3. Shri Manoj K. Sinha, I submits that respondent No.4i State Government.’ He furth commission has been given only grievance remains is that Shri M.P.S.Bhatia, lear the State submits that if it is representation in this regard a competent authority will decid Prayer is also not opp'o appears to be reasonable. Accordingly, this petitio file representation afresh f0 competent authority within a same shall be decided by t Government,in accordance wi possible, preferably, within a receipt of representation. No order as to costs. |
§WKTT“ E nselforthe petmoners ty Government Advocate for the éarned counsel for the petitioners has already been merged with the r submits that benefit of 5‘“ pay o the petitioners by the State but rrears were not paid. ed Dy. Government Advocate for so, then the petitioners may file a d if such representation is filed, the the same in accordance with law. ed by the petitioners' counsel and is disposed of. If the petitioners payment of arrears before the eriod of one month from today, the e competent authority, i.e., State h law on its own merits, as early as eriod of 6 months from the date of -,r,., 1’ Ff H Sd/- N.K. Agrawal ti Judge f |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a representation for payment of arrears can be filed afresh
Whether to institute/remove earlier petition merger
Madhya Pradesh Takniki Matsyodhyogadhikari sangh Raipur
A.K. TiwarjT
Praidap Yadav
State of Madhya Pradesh
Director of Fishiries
N.K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
