The petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition (No. 97/2005) has become infructuous due to the passage of time. The single-judge bench dismissed the petition on these grounds and disposed of MCW No. 673/95 accordingly.
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous; MCW No. 673/95 was also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
“3
QMM mm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CG N
WRIT PETITION Naa 9’ 0 /2005
PETITIONER:~
./ §¥« Bhagwot Prosad Agrowal s/O—
I 033$/ Late Jagunncxth Prosod Agrawal
“\Q‘v" \v Aged about 56
g;.' ..¢ 'ka Occupoh'on :— High Schoolyears,
Principal,
kw. Senior
Government
\ @ Higher Secondary
§ ‘ School, Lavsaro District
fag ..
e § Chompo [c.G.)
Q§i‘ §$§fr
«kg
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
t) The State of Chhattisgarh
The State of Chhattisgarh Through:-Secretary Schoot Department, Raipur Educatton D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (CG)
2]
Director, Public Education Raipur iC-G-)
District EducationOfficer, Champa (C.G.‘)
.a
N UNDER ARTICLE 2/26 227 OF TH E NSTITUTION OF iNDiA
$ WDZ 05
WWW? H12 0
:mmaahiw
mmfa‘w mm fsém >
’
g wmm %§ifaum
!
SB Han’bfe Shri Justice WKK. ‘ o’arwai
4 a a
{‘iéMZLMJ
Shi‘i B? Baa§are, Advecate for the peiitioxler,
Sim MEDS Elam; Dy Gov . Aévgcate far the Siata,
Leameri cgunsci agpearm» fer th€ psmiorasr submi$s that with
ihe paSSage oftime‘this paiitiog h s 110w become infillctuou$
Accm‘diagiy, the petifian is diSmissed as having become
inmctumm, NO ordar aS ta CQSts.
Consaqueiitly, MCW}? No 673/95 alSO stmyk diS§aoSed 0i
Sd/-
N. K. Agarwal ‘
Judge {
Sam V ' V ~1"
‘
WWW, WES/4H/zo12—somo. i
x7<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the original writ petition has become infructuous due to the passage of time.
Bhagwot Prosad Agrowal
The State of Chhattisgarh
N. K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
