The Chandigarh High Court dismissed a writ petition under Articles 226/227, ruling that the issue had already been decided and holding that similar petitions were dismissed by the same Court in WP No. 5092/2006 involving Gurucharan Sahu.
Writ petition and consequential MWP are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREAT BILASPUR
^t
CHHAmSGARH .7),
^tel.ft
^w'^"/
?••••' -••••'
y-A^-'x 318
A^I^> WR[T PETITION. N0. OF 2006
^^cr'y
./sy BETWEEN
^yy
^
^"
1. Koshal Kumar Sonwani S/o Ram Naresh Sonwani, aged about
^r^
30 years, resident of ViUage Khola, Post Khola, Block Abhanpur
District Raipur (CG).
2. Puranik Ram Sinha S/o Ounit Ram Sinha, aged about years,
resident of Village Umarpoti Post Sunderkera, Block Abhanpur
District Raipur (CG).
3. Yamuna Prasad Joshi S/o Manrakhan Lal Joshi, resident of
Village and Post Kathiya No.2 Block Abhanpur District Raipur
»/"
(CG).
4. Hori Lal Kaushik S/o Subechand Kaushik, aged about 30 years,
resident of Village and Post Khola, Block Abhanpur District
Raipur(CG).
^n.v PETITIONERS
.A^" "31
^r AND
RA*'
1. The State of Chhattisgarh,
Through the Secretary Department of School Edycation ,
Chhattisgarh, Mantralay D.K.S. Building, Raipur (C.G.)
RESPONDENTS
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
'>
/ •"t'T"
-f
XI-HC—78
'S'Sf '<)l<iW4, 8)Tll'H'l<», 1«1<<11'M^<
r....^-(P"^.V?,-|--^-----WI,20
sn^i'TsR; cyf^ti)
Slt^F ^I R-f1+ <<iwifi<fl-< ><it<<-ff^[ fets <r-iit<i<
T^iw^ri?a3n^i
wn sn^v aiiro ^siRpTCT^r
10.12.2013:-
None for the petitioners.
Ms. Raksha Awasthy, Par)iel Lawyer for the State/ respondents.
The issue raised in this wtit petition has already been decided and
similar writ petitions have been flismissed by this Court vide order dated
5.12.2013 passed in the matter)of Gurucharan Sahu and another Vs.
State of Chhattisgarh and ())thers (WP No. 5092/2006) & other
connected matters.
Accordingly.'this writ petit|on is also dismissed in the same terms.
A copy of the order passed in tt|ie matter of Gurucharan Sahu (Supra)
bekept in the record of the pres^int writ petition.
Consequently, M(W)P N(| i .2447/2006 afso stands dismissed.
Barvi Prashant Kumar Mishra
Judge
.h-
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gurucharan Sahu and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and othersDistinguished¶8
Gurucharan Sahu and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ()thers (WP No. 5092/2006)
Koshal Kumar Sonwani
Puranik Ram Sinha
Yamuna Prasad Joshi
Hori Lal Kaushik
The State of Chhattisgarh
Barvi Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
