This judgment dismisses Writ Petition No. 51414 of 2006 for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on three calls, though a stand counsel appeared for the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t»-
IN THE HlW COURT OF JUbIC^TURE_AT^BlJ.ASPUB. CHHATnSSARH
Writ Petltion No. S l414—of2006
PETITCONER:
..^w^
^l^.'
?^'v>'"..;a^-^9^-""'^.•••";";?M^y-' •s^'" '^.••"'''y^( t^.>"' - Versus-
:SPONbENTS: 1.
*--'
-o^
2.
^:^^0&
^%^
3.
^^"
Banshilal s/o Paran 5oihu, aged about 44 r/o C/15, years, Goyemmsn* Qucrts", Bshind Ciyi! Court, burg (CG).
5tate ot C'hhatfisqarh through the Secretary Department of Revenue, &.K.S. Bha,vaCT, Raiou" (C6).
Smt. Santoshi Nirmulkar, Assistant Grade III, posted at the office of Deputy CoNector, Coitectorate, Ourg (C6).
WRTT PETmON UNDER ARTlCLE 2z6/227 uF THE CON'STITvTION OF IN&IA FOR ISSUANCE OF APPROPRInTE WRIT/WRITS. DIRECTIONS ETC.
B
0;
78
'3^ "MI-SiiCl'4, ^Tlty^, fs<<?1l^^<
C..l.M...^..t..lt
^..a^.,
-3n^I'q^?(^T3^q)
sn^r^Tf?:?w
«flWHfef3fI^t wifepftf w^i ^ fs^S "(fai
'tT^T 3TT^?| ^ifrii^) ^raffwtTsn^r
9.12.2013:-
When the matter is calledl out, none appears for the petitioner. No
representation is made. Ev^n on 2nd call, none appears for the
petitioner.
Ms. Raksha Awasthy, Pajlel Lawyer for the State.
In the circumstances, th|ie writ petition is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Badve
Sd/-
Prashant Kun'ar Mishra
•ludge
Banshilal s/o Paran 5oihu
State of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary Department of Revenue
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
