Dismissed
Samaru Ram v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWP/2803/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
y'l^"c „ r - ^^•^S^-.-----"""" c •° Aatsd-…
What the court decided
AI extract
y'l^"c „ r - ^^•^S^-.-----"""" c •° Aatsd-…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
...^^ssy^ . f^.Na-^:'S.M:> y'l^"c c„ •°r - ^^•^S^-.-----"""" Aatsd-
ttf. t-t'Slsl
| IN THE HIGH CO | URT OFJUDICATUREAT BILASPURCHHATTISGARH WRIT PETITION N0?-eo3/2006 |
|
|---|---|---|
| ^ | PETITIONER | : ^ Samaru Ram S/o- Baratu Ram, Aged about59 years, PermanantGangman, Rajnandgaon-Antagarh Road BalodSubdivision, P.W.D District-Durg (C.G.) |
| VERSUS | ||
| RESPONDENTS | StateofChhattisgarh Through-the Secretary, PublicWorks Department, D.K.S.Bhawan,Raipur(C.G.) |
|
| / " •'!:=^'"'°;%' •jy |
Finance Secretary, StateofChhatisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) |
|
| IH/^/-e^ | / 3. Sub-Divisional Officer Balod Sub-Division no.1, C.G. PWD, PWD |
|
| WRIT PETITION UNDER | Office, Balod, District-Durg (C.G.) J ARTICLES 226AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA |
T
XI-HC—78
~S:s( -tiwwi, •s-Awie, [qdiyy
^^.....<.Af..4o...^^^20
*^r »
sn^T'q^? (•yl^°i<iT)
sn^t w R-titk TCiIWaf??! 3TI^T +l^Id^*l 'RH^ff ^f fs^ <r<q<$R
WIT ai^i s»ii'n ^affinan^T
10.12.2013:-
Shri Basant Dewangan, cctunsel for the petitioner.
Shri Ajay Dwivedi, De^uty Govt. Advocate for the State/
respondents.
Heard.
Learned counsel for the lliarties would submit that the matter is
covered by the decision renderej by this Court in the matter of Govind
& othere Vs. State ofChhattisg|arh & others {2007 (2) CGLJ 29}.
In view of the above, the >resent writ petition is also disposed of
in the same terms.
Consequently, M(W)P No.114041/2006 also stands disposed of.
Sd/-
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Barv^
Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Govind & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & othersRelied on¶10
Govind & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & others {2007 (2) CGLJ 29}
Samaru Ram
State of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court