Single Judge Bench allowed an application for restoration of Final Appeal (Memorandum) No. 115/2012, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution, finding the non-appearance was based on bonafide grounds.
M.C.C. No. 939/2013 is allowed and F.A.(M) No. 115/2012 is restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OFCHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
cf3<^ M.C.C..NO. /2013
(Arisingautoforderdated21.08.2013 passedbyHon'bleD.B. II)
APPELLANT/ Krishna Chandra Yadav, S/o
^plicant o^ -Shri Puniram Yadav, age-25 years,
.'.^
Occupstion - Labour, R/o.-Vtilage-
^0 y!/•'.>
Junwani, Tah.& District- Raigarh (C.<3.)
^
y'^
VERSUS
. <^^-"
' "<y
RESFbNDENT/^ >mt. Shantoshi liai Yadav,
on-apDlicant W/o-Shn Krishna Chafidra, D/0-
Dukalu Yadav,R/o-Village- Thakurd^ya
Mohalla, Kharsiya,Tahsil- Kharsiya,
DistFict- Raigar-h (C.G.)
AtPLICATIONFOR RESTORATION OF F.A.fMLNO, u.5/20t2
HIGH GOURTOFCHHATTISGARH. Bll.ASPUR
D.B.: HON'BLE MR. SUNIL KUMAR SINHA &
HON'BLE MR, RANGNATH GHANDRAKAR. JJ,
M.C.C. N0.939/2013
APPLICANT Krishna Chandra Yadav
Versus
RESPONDENTS Smt. Shantoshi Bai Yadav
(APPLICATION FOR RESTORAnQN OF FA.(M)NO. 115/2012)
£—-....—...—-.^.—.......„:
ADDearahce:
y Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant.
ORDER
a (2ndofDecemben2013)
PerSuniTKumarSinha. J.
isrestored to its original number.
Sd/Sunil Kumar Sinha Judge
Sd/R.N. Chandrakar Judge
Anu
Krishna Chandra Yadav
Smt. Shantoshi Bai Yadav
Sunil Kumar Sinha
Rangnath Ghandrakar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
