Makdu Korwa and Ors. v. Latha and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
IN_3§S_g^g^e®JK^_(^,CaiHA^r^saRH A !E…
IN_3§S_g^g^e®JK^_(^,CaiHA^r^saRH A !E…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1@;:s
^
IN_3§S_g^g^e®JK^_(^,CaiHA^r^saRH A!E BIJASPUIt-
Second Ci.vi.l Appeal NO./O)^ /2001.
APPEliL&N'r ; (1.) Makla Kprwa S/o aidhaT-i,,,aged45yrs PLASCTSE R/o K^eluiar&ih, •Eabt. Sitapur,^ Bistj-;.; Surgi.i.j.a.CC.G. ) .
(2) ant. Kirri Bai D/o Budhari (Bead). :
VE R SU S
(l) Iiatha S/o Pandaru, aged about 62 yr.s.
(2)tTetliu S/oE'uiree,agedabout85 yrs,
(3)Lathur S/o Paireeagedabou.t50 yrs,
(4) RaiachaFan S/o Pn.iree, aged 4|5 years.
All are hy caste Korwa R/o KachUa.rd.Lh aahsil Sltapur,- Qlstt. SargBya ^(G .8. V. ,
(5) Sfcate ofcaahattisgar'h Tfcirough : Collector, .ABiblkapar, Distt. Sar-gu.ja ,(C«G.^
s iii
^ECOiSD eXVIL. &PEB&l4,JJND%.SX:T-K.iN.,iaOCIWIL^gROGEgJRE, SODE .OE 1908,.,,.
M l!8
^
^^ "LII*lldAI, t?fll<l-l<l<s, fsXII'M'^i'
1^3
"W( 200
sn^r 'w (.^(•i«(<^()
ii^i ^l Rs-fi'*
TOireR ^ifta aii^i <t)rafo<i)*i 1^n^f ^f 'fe^ <f^^«
^w 3n^(a»<ro ^affimsii^i
S.B. Hon'ble Shri JustK»N.K. Aaarwal
08.02.2012
None for the appellants.
Shri Sanjeev Agrawal, Pem|el Lawyer fbr Uie State.
The matter is calfed for he|artng twice. On both theoceasiore,
none appeare nor any represe|itatication is made on behalf of the
appellants. The appellants may ^dt be inter^ed in the matter.
In view of the above, th|i matter is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
N.K Agrawal
Judge
Sahu
"• ••l^...uiMt»itteAiaA»uiii<j.,
Makla Kprwa
Jai Kirri Bai
State of Chhattisgarh
N.K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court