Appellants failed to appear in the second round of presentation of prosecution witnesses. The learned Single Judge had no option but to proceed with prosecution and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
@
Q] (? £3?
IN TE-HJ‘ HIGH COURT OF CI-H-IATTISGARH AT BILASPUR.
M.A.. No.
[oqL:/2003. @ii?
ARPELLANTS : 1.A. Bhavsagar @ Budu s/o Late sahdev,
, aged about 4O years, Occupaticn-
/BEFENDANTSJ /
Agriculture, r/o village Turna,
Tehsil Ambikapur, Distt. 3urguja,CG
B . ant. Supari Bai w/o Late sahdev,
/ aged abtou 65 years, Occupation-
Household, r/o village Turna,
Tehsil Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja,CG
(LRs OF DFD. No. 1)
VRsU§E
IPLAINTIFFRESESPONDNTS .v’ : 1. Nohar say s/o Ramnath (Dead)
#‘Q$3» Netram h/o Sonkumari, aged about 7S
If?' yes,ar Otuccupation:-Agriculre,
r/o village Durna, P.s. Daria,m
meggx@g' . ‘ Tehsil'mbikapur, Surguja, (LG.
‘
\§‘.,- Bc Bharduaj s/o Netram, aged about 50
€°\g‘w years, Occupation-Agriculture, r/o
village Nawapara, P.S./Tehsil-
Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja. C.G.
w
(3.?’ Mordhwaj s/o Netram, aged about 45
years, Occupation-Agriculture,
r/o village Durna, P.s. Darima,
Tehsil Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja,CG
Jagesar s/o Netram, aged about 4O
years, Occupation-Agriculture,
r/o village Durna, Tehsil Ambikapur
Distt. Surguja, C.G.
39 Ramprasad s/O Nandu, aged about 35
years.
Kumna
”,4. s/o Bargah, ‘aged about45 years
\ a
¢ /W No. 3 and 4 Occupation-Agriculture,
6% r/o village Turna, P.S. & Tehsil
Ambikapur, Distt. surguja, C.G.
D
1
contd..2
f'".r; +
3%: mama, mm, WW3?
WWWMANHMygW m
| sné‘zr ESTm MI Wm2? |
é: $137 (Wrig ' Ema? '«Wgaam |
w; E mm?W $1 1%,"2? traan é; aimWm |
|---|---|---|
| v | Noné for the acme [ants None for the respondents Even after the matter was 4 appeared feF the appellants ther Court has no other option but proseGUtlOD. Accordingly, the misc. a prosecution. $ B HON’BLE MR JUSTICE N K 07 02 2012. |
t caned In the second round nene efore m these Circumstances this o dismiss the appeal for want of peel is dismissed for want of Sr!!- N. K. Agaiwal Judge AGARWAL |
A. Bhavsagar @ Budu
Supari Bai
Netram h/o Sonkumari
B. Bhardwaj
Mordhwaj s/o Netram
Jagesar s/o Netram
N. K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
