The appeal was dismissed by this court as the appellant failed to appear for the hearing and no representation was made on their behalf during the second round of hearing.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of the appellant and lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
m W gmm, W . £14 NOAH: WWW “m 2&0} m W?) QWrqm
3mm an mm
mmm
mmm
3r aim MW
SB: HON. SHRI N.K. AGARWAL, J.
I i 06.02.2012
None for the appellant.
Shri N.S.Dhurandhar, counsel for the respondents.
Even when the matter was called for hearing in second round, no
«m
one appears for the appellant nor any representation is made on his
“Since no one appears for the appellant nor any representation is
1 made on his behalf, therefore, this Court is left with no option but to
dismiss the appeal for non-prose :ution.
This appeal is dismissed for non-prosecug/
//
t
séJ‘ wa <br>w \k. k9 a‘ / p
wdge /
«to ,/’ «
\A
-
i
l
.— W two L-”
m Qawm, WW~FSI14om2/201 1—1 ,so,ooo.
Appellant
Respondents
N.K. AGARWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
