Matter dismissed for want of prosecution as none appeared and no representation was made on behalf of the appellant on recording occasions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OR.onojss i-si. MJ3 pyhsi^001. i>m /y/p/? ^^iis>iabtn/?(pg/ f InltlJslbf'IVlft (OJtOS) A^V/A?^/ SlS3U^-lMS 'Z , t^^llk OltOQ. ftsitOs) >RH'I^ -n^ '^&fr l^>y.SP 'c^-Mfi-^l^j. fhl^ hlXbl^JI^^ O^. m^. •/ ^ 09 Sf y±l& Mh^ J^ & Si^J. -^) W^^WK (Olt.OQ)^ftA/A)^/-//^/"/ ' '^f».h V(^SP ^ ItUt-^d^ ^•^y'j^ff^-l'-MM'-W 'p^ SS RlK^rm^!^^ A?/A? ^.j^ O^i. ^/b -?1 tlS^^^^^h^
ZI-OZ/-^- O^. J^fifS' >iat>ho h(pQ ®/,»(p<0A^/AWg/ (OhOft} A-W/fr/fr. ^fi tt^tklb -SStli
^l
•
'S^'^fPV^, yxTI'H'ls, fs|<yll'H^<
—......^&:.......iiJ..i..l^--..
WVvU **«<*>--•^•—-••--•---^••--^[^200
SH^TT 'fW ( yil3<i't'iT)
sn^iwft^ ctll^^^^ itWV^ ^ 1S^ <P^f<
TRITO ^lftff SD^T
WT-an^ffS?^? ^siRnail^fr
S.B. Hon'bte Shri Jy^ee K. ^WKN"waJ
08.02^012
None for the appdlant.
Shri Sanjeev Agrawal, Par^el Lawyer for the State.
The matter is called tor he|ring twlce. On both the oecaslons,
none appeare nor any represe(rtation js made on beh^f of the
appellant. The appellant may nol beftiterested in the matter.
In vtew of the above, thife matter is dlsrrtssed for want of
pro^iecution.
ss/- .
.N.K.A.gas'wstl^
Sahu
ws^lv ffda ijCTRCT, (mwira'—cs/140—2/2011—i,so,ooo.
4-
Appellant
The State
Jyotirad K. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
