First Appeal under S. 96 CPC. The single judge dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as the appellants were unrepresented at the hearing.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COTJRT OF JUDICATDSE 05' HADHYA PRADESH.JABALPUR.
E'irst Appeal No. /96.
APPELLANTS/PLAIHTIFFS . iLaxai Bai W/o. Ramaath By Cast | Gond, Occapatlon agriCQlture, !^' 2.Choadhary S/o. Ramnata By cast Goad ,age 8 years, HiQor througti' / his inother and next friend ! / BS (Appellant No.l) i .- 3.Ramnath S/o. Panika Goiad, disable persoa i All resideiits of village | Annapurna ps-Prem Hagar, The| Sarajpur Distt- Sarguja, KP. i
-Versus-
•-, t-Bf- ^,^p^.-^',»^.^rK"~
RESPOHDEHTS/DEFENDASTS
APPEAL U/S.96 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDTJRE.
.^1<C--78
^
•^'l ^. J^^.-S^^TT, t^tt'ffTTp'. tew^-
s'
'ff:T
,c<-. ;..^!.<s./cig'
Wn'?-TT 'KW
21)
3)T^?T v^'g? ( waf^iI^ST)
3TP:-?I ^ Ti^TnSi' ^"•T.''?]^-' w'r I ~gr.T ·trare.TT
?ian a-?,'?iw?i^ ?WI?,rC Tlf?q- 311^1 T iTf?T7 •;fT'T5T
S.B: HON'BLE MR..IUSTICEIN.K.AGARWAL
09.08.2012: I
None for the petitioners|
As there is no represe^tationon behalf of the petrtioners, this
Court has no othgr option byt to disinss the M.C.G. for want of
prosecution.
Accordingly, the M.C.C is dismissed for wantof prosecuSon,
e>&i'.^^
i.s€e
-6^
-J -
.//;
1 'i';r:'
Wl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal can be dismissed because there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Laxmi Bai W/o. Ramadath
Chadchary S/o. Ramnath
Ramnath S/o. Panika Gond
Alam Sai
Bhawar Sai
Indrasa Widow of Balaoran
H.K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
