Second appeal under Section 100 CPC was preferred but appellant's counsel sought and was granted permission to withdraw the appeal without fees.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a legally constituted appeal. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
_LtL
tja-SaSSSff.'-^'•j^'-. •'•
•^
IN THE HIGH COURT CHHATTISGARH_ AT_BILASPUR
SECOND APPEAL N0. ^2'lSt 72012
ABBellants <t.
~i/
Plaintiffs 3.
,.^^^t''t
^^•--""
^•"
Reseondents - 1.
2.
Defendents
'.''
,4.
f-,
6/-
Satyendra Singh age 52 years
Yogendra Singh age 48 years
Krishna Singh age 41 years
all ofthem s/o Late Ajay Singh r/o Village - Kutighat, Tahsil Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G.
At present r/oTikrapara, Tahsil &DiS£i. Bilaspur (C.G.)
VERSUS
Yashwant Singh age 55 years s/o Vijay
Singh
Arjun Singh age 70 years s/o Kedsr Singh
Chandrapal Singh age 68 years s/o Kedar Singh
all of them r/o Village Risdd, Tahsil Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur C.G.
Kishor Kumar Ghore age 47 years s/o Horilal Ghore, r/o Dayalband, Tahsil & Distt. Bilaspur C. G.
Ravish Bole age 45 years s/o Jagannath Bole, r/o Shivaji Marg Tikrapara, Tahsil & Distf. Bilaspur C.G.
Smt. Seetabai age 80 years w/o Ajay Singh, r/o Village Kutighat, Po. Konargarh, Tahsil Pamgarh, Distt. Janjgir-Champa C.G.
"^^
c^?
c
MEMORAIMBUM ~^r OF SECOND APPEAL UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 03.03.2012 PASSED BY IV TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICTJUDGE BILASPUR fC.G.1 IN CIVILAPPEAL N0. 21A/2011 WHICH ISANNEXED AS ANNEXURE A'l, AFFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.57.2010 PASSED BY I .f ST CIVIL JUDGE CLASS-II BILASPUR (•C.G.MN to^" CIVIL SUTT N0. 16-A/2009.
,<»*
Claim vaiued of second appeal 2600-00,Rs. s court fee paid 260-00 Rs. /
The appellants/Plaintiffs being aggrieved by the impunged judgement and decree beg to preffer this appeal, inter-alia, on the following facts and substantial questions of law :-
'.S^x
;iy^
37;^[ ^s,s>f]^7S, t^frffrTS'. tcRTO'T1'
'^^•••^ •ITO^-^^ m 21)
arr^T vra ('}?f5iR?r)
^'?T^Tl^t^i 'iir''!'?!7?''-' nTq-:.'n if fgrA traff,:T( •gi'n sr!TO wtfw I^'iw Tfifg CT^I T .^"'q ifr-Tn S.B. Hon'ble ShriJustice N.K. Aaarwal 07.08.2012 I •t—.A Shri Aman Kesharwani, A^vocate for the appellaats.
Leamed counsel appearti^ for the appellants, on instruction, seeks permission of this court tojwithdraw this appealwith liberty to file legally constituted appeal. Prayer is allowed. 1 Accordingly, appeal is disgiissed as withdrawn with the above stated liberty. No order as to cos^. Registry is directed to retufn the certilied copy ofthe impugned order on counsel's fumishing aufljienticated tme copy ofthe same.
Sd/N-K.AgarawaJ Sahu Judge
•^SS^^I^^^S
-y/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Satyendra Singh
Yogendra Singh
Krishna Singh
Yashwant Singh
Arjun Singh
Chandrapal Singh
N.K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
