Disposed
Birja Singh and Another v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCMCC/76/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Bench IK__THE HIGE GOGEI! OF CHa&'DfEISH6AEH…
What the court decided
AI extract
Bench IK__THE HIGE GOGEI! OF CHa&'DfEISH6AEH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sSS^^il !l8'^'J:-::>i
*l.
CF0000054321
e-r'71 Division Bench IK__THE HIGE GOGEI! OF CHa&'DfEISH6AEH AT BUASPUB (C.G). ft-Vc^ ^& "Li.C.G^CSB.HO. 1494/200e) 4^92APPELIASS'S/ 1. Birja Singh S/o Late Eaasaran ' EIAIH'FICTS Singb, aged about 65 yearspoccupa'fcion-retired servent. (Plain-tiff Ho.1) 2. Akshaywar Singh S/o late EamsaraB Singh, aged abou-fc 65 years, ocoupatioB^^^. retired servant. ^^^OC^...'^' - •• (Plaintiff No.2) Both are resxdeB-b o£ Navapara, Azad ^' WardHagar Anbikapur, P.S. and'Eahsil Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (G.6).| 7EESUS EESPOTOEIO'S/ 1. Sta.te of Clihattishg^rfa i , 3'hrough Gellector S'QFSuja,; Ambikapur. (Defeadaiit Ho.1) Shri Amir Ali, Ihen Additioaal Gollector;,i Aia'bxkapur, Surguja. i (Defendant No.2) ; Shri T.S. Ghatwal 'Phen eollector Surgaja, Ambifeapur. (Defendant Ho.5) '.:' 'T."/ ^. Sbri C.L. Tsdav i j 'Ehen Hayate Sabsildar Naziffl.|,' ,;..; ^ Aabikapur, Bis-bt. Surguaaj |CB,^ •i-4§.FOa (DefeBdant No.4) »• •&-* |_^ •
^•i
^^^.
L* ^^^OC^...'^' 1 I^-'" J' .;<^ ...'^' - ••
F3^UI
J-:-'""" ^'
'i\
APPI.ICA'nOH TO FEEHI'E TO IHS2ITTOE A FIES'i? CIVFE, APPEA.L B?
IHBIGETO CAPra3LMH31S)PEBSOIiS OHBEB QKSEE 35 BU@; 1,5 0?
:*a^%. " '<• xr-nc—78
......T-1^ V.
S4
—••"";lM
.TcT^ .7,:rarcCT, ^ti'ffITn;'. i^WR
^•^'
& -^
'?FT.
WV^TJ 'CTra;
21)
a.fT^r Tgw ('prf^i^i'T) *
311^'f; ^I T^IRi
W-^!'-' w-r 4 fgl<t •(rerejt
'Bqi ST?^ ifi41+ ^V.W T(!??f SH^T ^ 'l'^-T"' '^T9T
S. B. Hon' ble^Shri Justice N.K. Asarwal
09.08.2012 |
Shri Neeraj Choubey on b^half of Shri HS Tripathi, Advocate
for the appellants. :'
Shri Sanjeev Agrawal, Panel Lawyer for the State.
Leamed couasel appearing] for the appellants seeks permission
of this court to withdraw this ca.se with liberty to file the same if
i
occasion anses.
j
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, the case is di^missed as withdrawn with the above
—
stated liberty. No order as to cos^s. ———
Sd/-
N.K Agrawal
Judge
Sahu
-—-1.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court