Dismissed
Smt. Laxmi Bai Manikpuri v. Itwari Kumar Kannoje
Chhattisgarh HCMCC/901/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) 3^…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.) 3^…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-^'
'"uAf
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR (C.G.)
3^
M.C. C. N0.' / 2011
^Smt Laxmi Bai Manikpuri Aged about 27 Years, W/o Amrit Lal Manikpuri, Resident at Lakhe nagar, Pragatri Chowk, Behind Rammandir, Raipur, Tahsil 8s, District Raipur (C.G.)
APPELLANT : ^EFENDANT:
Versus
SESPONDENT Itwari Kumar kannoje Aged /'PLAINTIFF about 46 years, S/o Sunduru Ram kannoje Resident of Lakhe Nager, Pragati Chowk, Behind Rain Mandir Raipur, Tahsil & Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TD-FILE AN APPEAL AS AN PAUPER UNDER ORDER"44 RULE 1 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 1908.
rvc^
"S^ -^wwi, a)flly<ic, fadiyy HI*<?(T <a»*iiq» ^.M.^........3D....f..-v^^
sn^r'TO^ ('j^taiyi)
'iisH^i^T»Ili<^3)1^1 V R;-f TRIIW^ftBan^il <hi^Tfl^ TITO^f "^ ly^ ^^H
^?3iRffI3TI^I
S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justtee N .K .. A Iaanwal
09.02.2012
None for the appetlant.
None for the respondent.
The matter is calleJ for hejaring twice. On both ttie ocrasions,
none appears nor any represe|itation is made on behalf of the
appellant. The appellant may no\ be intere^ed in the matter.
In view of the above, th|a matter is dismissed for vrant of
prosecution.
Sd/-
N.K. Agarwal
Judge
Sahu
WI'Sf\V ifsft!) SSriRBT, CTiRRirra'—FS/140—2/2011-1,50,000.->"
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Laxmi Bai Manikpuri
Itwari Kumar kannoje
N K Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court