Dismissed
Uderram Sahu v. Parniya Bai Sahu and Anr.
Chhattisgarh HCMA/89/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^
IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
(C.G.1<3i3 srn9fe Bencft MISC. APPEAL N0. OF 2011
APPELLANT & Plaintiff
,^UderamSahu,agedabout57 years, S/o Kejuram Sahu, R/o Nawadeeh Rajeem, Tahsil Rajeem, District Raipur (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS .Befendants fr
,0< .C;TV'...•••: 2. ^yi...-<^^x'o^"".<^/-<'/ ^y' -A..-
Parniya Bai Sahu, aged about 70 years,Wd/oBharosiramSahu,R/o Nawadeeh Rajeem, Tahsil Rajeem, District Raipur (C.G.)
State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Collector, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
<^--'' MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 U OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
^
^rv
Xi-HC—78
•3rc[ ^n'qra^, ^flwTs, 'ferray
.M..^.IS-....B^Z).(..
Ai
W '••WR (Y^il^q)
sn^i^f?^:
'+i<<ld41-t •w^i •? fsW Tfesn
wnw ^wa STT^!
n'qi 3TI3?I WEHi<; ^sffNail^l
S.BLHON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.N. AQARWAL
03.02.2012: I
. P.P:-Sahu, counsel for the appeltant.
Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai and IVIr. Suresh Tandon, counsel for
1.
Mr: Akhil Agrawa!, counsel for respondent No.
Learnedcounsel appearin^ for the appellant
of thiscourt to vwthdraw this appefrl.
Permission granted.
Accordingly.the misc. appejal is dismi^ed as
Sd/-
N.K. Agarwal
Judge
01-
-I-
^
BFFfnl
Uderam Sahu
Parniya Bai Sahu
State of Chhattisgarh
N.N. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court