Madhukar Simankar v. State of C.G. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur. W. P.…
High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur. W. P.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
. . , /' In the Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur. W. P. (S) N0... g???.....2007 Petitioner - MADHUKAR SIMANKAR / V\ S/o Late SHIVRAM SIMANKAR r3?"° ¢I ?‘% \Q*'§; 60\ VA?” BHARKA PARA, WardNo.26 Distt. Rijnéndgaon (C.G.) /. Versus RsespBndent 1. State’Govt. of C.G. Through— The Secretary, Forest Deptt. DKS Bhawan,Raipur (Cg) 2r Chief Conservatorof Forest, AARANYA BHAWAN, Medical CollegeRoad,Raipur (C.G.) 3. Divisional ForestOflicer, (TenduLeaveBranch) Bhanupratappur,Distt‘Bastar (C.G.) _/ 4. Managing Director, DisttForest Produce Co—Op.Union Ltd. Bhanupratappur,Kanker (C.G.) / . W Writ Petition UnderArticles226/ f The ConstitutionOfIndia for the issuance of WRIT in the nature of MANDAMUS certiorari Prohibition andforothersuitablewritorwrits order or orders direction or directions.
WGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT B!LASPUR WRIT PETITION (3g NO~ 5091 OF 2007
Petitioner
Madhukar Simankar
Versus
Resgondents
State Govt. of C.G. & Others .
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTTTUTION OF INDIA
{SB:Hon’bie Mr. Satish K. Agnihotri, J.)
Present :- Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri N.N.Roy, Panel Lawyer‘for the State.
ORDER ORAL (Passed on 03' day of February, 201 1)
7t.
Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this
Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursUe the representation before the authorities concerned.
Learned counsel appearing for other side has no objection.
it is ordered as prayed for.
ashok
Madhukar Simankar
State Govt. of C.G.
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court