This judge disposed of a writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking a compassionate appointment. The court directed the respondent authorities to consider the application under prevailing policies. The judge did not adjudicate the merits of the dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
@tgg;
9
$M§¥LE EEim‘ii r
S”
H COURTOFJUDICATUREATBILASPURCHHATTISGARH m 7
N THE HIG
Anusuiya BaiDhruv,W/ o.Late M‘R. Dhruv , aged‘about35 years, R/o. LaxmiProvisionStores,Ekta Chowk, TumgaonGaonRoad,Distt. Mahasamund, (C.G.)
VERSUS
RESPONDENT(S) f; (1) ChhattisgarhGraminBank,through its Chairman, Recreational Road, a x) Caoubeyi Coiony, Distt. Raipur (cot)
(2)
Branch Manager, Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank, Branch — Devbhog, Distt.Raiur p(C.G. )
WRITPETITIONUNDERARTICLE226OFTHECONSTITUTIONOF
INDIA
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR
WRIT PETITION (S) NO.104 OF 2009
PETITIONER Anusuiya Bai Dhruv
Versus
RESPONDENTS Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank & Another
(WlitPetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionofIndia)
Single Bench : Hon’ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri, J.
Present :- Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Shri Pramod Verma, Sr. Advocate with Shri Sumit Verma, Advocate for the respondents.
ORDER ORAL
(Passedonthis3r day of February, 2011)
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Accordingly, the writ petitionis disposed of.
of. /~
L,
ll sa/
l\ Aw“otri
Satish K- >
Judge ;
ll
Anusuiya Bai Dhruv
Chhattisgarh Gramin Bank
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
