Allowed

Sikshit Swarojgar Udyog Coopera. v. State of C.G. and Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC4 Feb 2011MCC/49/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application under M.C.C. No. 49 of 2011, the High Court of Chhattisgarh restored Writ Petition (C) No. 128/2010, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution, citing a legitimate explanation for the applicant's counsel's absence and ordering payment of costs to the Legal Aid Committee.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition (C) No. 128/2010 restored to original file subject to payment of Rs. 750 as cost to the High Court Legal Aid Committee.

Sikshit Swarojgar Udyog Coopera… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Chhattisgarh HC (2011)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR fC.G.) M.C.C.NO. 43 OFS'Ol^ 2-©U

¶2

(Arising out of W.P. (C) No."'l 28/2010) & S^K&'^^-^ 311i'11

¶3

APPLICANT

¶4

^ .^y/
^M^
%^/^
<^~^'^-/<'
^y/^'
<cy
<»'

¶5

S^ffif . Swarojgar Udyog

¶6

Cooperative Society Limited, Near District Court, In fro not Shefer School, Shiv Marg, Vishnu Nagar (KududandyBilaspur(C.G.), Through: its Editor, .lyotiBhushan Gaur son of late Shri Suresh Chandra Gaur, aged about 44 years, Residentof Tilak Nagar, /Bilaspur(C.G.)

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

NON-APPLICANTS :

¶9

^tate of Chhattisgarh, Through: the Secretary, General Administration Chhattisgarh Government, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan,Raipur (C.G.)

¶10

'^The Chief Secretary, Government of Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.)

¶11

le General Manager,

¶12

"Samvad",

¶13

Chhattisgarh Near Woman Police Station, Raipur (C.G.)

¶14

'The Secretary, Managing Director, Public Relation (Chhattisgarh Govt.), Raipur (C.G.)

¶15

¶16

'' The Registrar,

¶17

Firms and Societies, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.)

¶18

^The Managing Director, Chhattisggrh Rajya Kri§hi Vipnan '°*' _(l'V)awa>^Ck ^ _' ^ 311)111 Board, Beej Btiaan (Grdund Floor), In frontof Chhattisgarh Hotel, G.E. Road, Ra'vigram, Telibandha, Raipur (C.G.)

¶19

APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P. (0 No. '128/2010, '/SHIKSHIT SWAROJGAR UDYOG COOPERATIVE SOCIETf LIMITED V/S. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND OTHERS", DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION VIDE ORDER DATED '27.08.2010

¶20

SSSBSSJISIISiBISiSS

¶21

•:^l;l'i3a'ffi'3i^gX'::''

¶22

mCjHCOURT OFCHHATTISGARHATBILASPUR

¶23

M.C.C.No.49of2011

¶24

APPLICANT

¶25

: Shikshit Swarojgar Udyod Cooperative Society Liniited

¶26

VERSUS

¶27

RESPONDENTS

¶28

State ofChhattisgarh & Ofhers.

¶29

APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF W.P.fQ No.128/2010.

¶30

SB: Hoii'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri. J.

¶31

Present: Shri Prakash Mishra, Advocate tor le applicant.

¶32

Shi-i N.N. Roy, Panel Lawyer forthe State.

¶33

(Passed on 4th day of Febroary, 2011)

¶34

Leamed counse! appeanng for the applicaiit submits that the counsel fbr the applicant could not appear on account of bonaflde mistake, therefore, Writ Petition (C) No. 128/2010, w-faich was dismissed on 27.08.2010 may be restored to its file.

¶35

Reasonable and sutlicient cause has been shown. Writ Petition (C) No. 128/2010, is restored to the original file, subject to paymeiit of a sum ofRs. 750/'- as cost to the High Court Legal Aid Coniniittee. A copy of this order be placed on record of the original writ

¶36

petition and the same be listed for hearing.

¶37

s.*^r"""' .Scdse

¶38

Arun

Sikshit Swarojgar Udyog Coopera. v. State of C.G. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sikshit Swarojgar Udyog Coopera. v. State of C.G. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anusuiya Bai Dhruv Vs C.G. Gramin Bank and Aother

Madhukar Simankar Vs State of C.G. and Ors.

Khilavan Prasad Vastrakar Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Jaikrishna Binjhawar Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Mrs.Reena Masih Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Others