The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging orders directing the petitioner to render services in Madhya Pradesh, noting that a subsequent order reallocated the petitioner to Chhattisgarh, rendering the petition infructuous.
Petition disposed of as having become infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHAmSGARH AT BILASPUR ?.P.(S( 0. -9 O / /2008
PBTITIONER C.L. Dhakad, S/o. Shri B.P. Dhakad,aged about 45 years, Occupation- Assistant Engineer (Civil), Pendra Road, Water Resources Department, DivisionMarwahi, Head -QuarterPendra Road, ^•^y^>".rfs"' ..••""' District- Bilaspur (C.G.) <^
SSESStiflBS
RESPONDENTS 1. Union of India, Through: Secretary, Department of Personnel & Training, Ministiy of Personnel Public Grievances 8s Pensions, 3rd Floor Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi- 110001. ^CE^^ State of Chhattisgarh Through: Secretary, Water Resources Department, D.K.S. CLERK10 ^.^^ Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.)
CLERK10 ^.^^
State of Madhya Pradesh Through: Secretary, Water Resources Department Vallabh Bhavan, Secretariat Bhopal (M.P.). Superintendent Engineer, Water Resources Departruent, Sihava Bhavan, Raipur (C.G.)
'^^^e f'f'1''*.^0^^ -IK ^Tsc^'^31as^^yf^
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS. PROHIBITION, CERTIORARI ETC. OR ANY OTHER DIRECTION OR ORDER TO DO JUSTICE IN THE MATTER
k:^.:
i^S^ff'^,
HIGH COURT OP CHHATTISGARH ; BILASPUR
Writ Petition (Sl No. 901 of2008
Petitioner C. L. Dhakad
Versus Respondenfcs Union oflndia& ofhers
WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226 OFTHE CONSnTUTION OF INDIA.
(SB: Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agaihotri J.)
| ShriSiuulOtwaui, Advocateforthe petltioner. ShriAbhishekSiaha, Advocate forfherespondent No.l. |
|
|---|---|
| Shri M. P. S. Bhatia, Depuly Govt. Advocateforthe respondents No. | |
| •^§yf^K^SSie^ .-*S.•'f^a-s'^^^g^" |
2and4. ShriRajeev Shrivastava, AdvocatefortherespoudeatNo.3. |
ORDBRfOralt (Passcd on fhis 8th day ofFebruaiy, 2010)
Heard.
| The petttioner 6as fited this petition questiorung fhe legaMty aad | |
|---|---|
| vaUdily of the orders dated 11.12.2007 (Annexure P/l) aad 22,8.2005 (Annexure P/2),wherebythepetitionerwasduBcted to renderhissemcesintfae StateofMadhyaPradesh. |
|
| Leanied counsel appeanng forthe respondent No.3 on fhe basis offhe letter dated 30.5.2008 (Annexure R/1), annexed wifh fhe retum ffled on 22.7.2009, submits that fhe Union of todia, |
|
| PersonnelandAdiiunisteation Deparbnent, New DeBu, vide otd.er | |
| dated 5.3.2008 has reaUocated the petitioner to the State of | |
| Chhatdsgarh. | |
| 3. | In view offhe above, accordiag to learued couasel appearu^;for fhe petitioner, nothiag survives inthispetitfonforadjudicatmn. |
| 4. 'niaktir |
Accordingfy, fhis petition staads disposed of, as haviag bccoine infi-uctuous. No orderastocosts. Sdi- SatishK.Agnihotri Judge |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition questioning the legality and validity of orders directing the petitioner to render services in the State of Madhya Pradesh survives given subsequent reallocation to Chhattisg
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.L. Dhakad
Union of India
State of Chhattisgarh
State of Madhya Pradesh
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
