Derha Ram v. Raja Ram Maize Products and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COUAT OF MADHYA PMDESH AT JABALPUR…
HIGH COUAT OF MADHYA PMDESH AT JABALPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
..^.^.^^..^.
BEFOAE THE HON'BLE HIGH COUAT OF MADHYA PMDESH AT JABALPUR
Writ Petition No/(~^<-J X /94 <> • ^c^"-^'
PETITIONERSS
1» Derha Ram s/o Oev Nath
Clo P^CMA T(<3^i^y^^ V-fi^^^' ^(^•'^A^// R^^^S^N <-M-^ ^^~
RESPONDENTS:
1» Raja Ram Maize Products Surgi Road, MOHAD, Rajnadgaon, DistoHajnandgaon (M.P)
3, Labour Court, Rajndnagaon (M.P)
PETITION.^NDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CCNSTITUTION OF INDIA-IN THE MATTEA CF ISSUAiNCE'OF A VtfftIT OF CERTIORARI -3< i.'!ANDAvlU_S__AND ANY CTHER WRIT OR DinECTION.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH : BILASPUR
Writ Petitioii No. 4282 of 1994
Petitioner DeriiaRam Versus Respondents Raja Ram M&ize Products & otliers
(Writ Ptetition underArticle 226/227 ofthe ConstttutiQnofIndi^
(SB:HonTate SIniSatishK.AgiiihotriJ.)
SIui Parag Kotecha, Advocate for fhe petitioner,
ORDBRtotall
( Passedon tliis8tfa day ofPebmaiy, 2010)
Heaid.
.-^ 1. Leanied counsel appeadng for tfie petitioircr subaiiite fhat 011 accoiiD.t of subsequent developmietits^ this petitioix has become infFuctiious as nofhiag survives in this matter to be adjudicated. 2. In view offhe foregoiag, fhe writ petiffon te dismissed as BaviEkg become iiifhictuous. Coxisequenfty, fhe iaferim order passed on 3. l<1995 staads vacated. No orderasto costs,
3 •
A copy of fhis oxder may be sent to fhe respondent No, 1 •
%Aur
Sd/Satish K. Agnihotri Judge
Derha Ram
Raja Ram Maize Products
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court