A petitioner's petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution presented twice. The court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution as neither the petitioner nor their representatives appeared on either hearing occasion.
The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
%}‘
JA‘
h]
R?
)L
»«r
K
‘ci§*»>
IN THEHIGHCOURTOFMADHYAPRADESHAT JABALPUR. \ .... /1994 Misc.PErm‘ioNN9. 1g7L1 cmounoaus YugulKishore8/0Late3hriKaran EETITIQNER: R/o Santra Singh, ageé22 years, J Badi, Durg (M.F.).
Versus —..¢~.
8?ONDҤTS: 1. StateofM.P. throughthe secretary. LOCal Self GOVernment Department. VallabhBhawan: BhOpal.J"
COmmis$ioner. Nagar Nigam, Burg.
PETITION UNDER maTICLEs 226/227 OE mgcowgwx‘rUTmN DF IN IA:
HIQ‘H COURT OF CHHAT'I‘ISGARH : BILASPUR, Writ Petition No. 1874 of 1994
Petitioner . YugulKishnre Versus . Respondents State of M.P. & another
(SB:HonhleShn'SatishKAgnmouiJ.)
Nam“ for the petitioner.
Shri N. N. Roy, Panel Lawyer for the mspondents.
o R D m n [only
(Passedonthis5thdayof February,20 10)
The matter is called forhean'ng twice. On both the occasions I
none appeam nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner.The petitionermaynotbeinterestedin prosecuting the matter.
In View of the foregoing, the petition is dismissed for want of‘
prosecution.
i SdlSatishK.Agnihotri ‘ Judge
Yugul Kishore & Late Srihari Khan
State of M.P.
Commissioner, Nagar Nigam
Satish K. Agnihotri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
