Allowed

Manish Agrawal v. Hemant Kumar and Others

Chhattisgarh HC7 Jul 2010MCC/328/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order granting restoration of a Motor Accident Case (C) Appeal No. 1217/2009, previously dismissed for want of prosecution. The court was satisfied that the applicant had been prevented by sufficient cause from prosecuting the appeal and allowed the application. The appeal is listed for hearing after two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Application for restoration allowed; Appeal No. 1217/2009 restored and listed for hearing.

Manish Agrawal Vs Hemant Kumar and Others — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2010)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDXCATURE CHHATTISGARH

¶2

AT BILASPUR

¶3

M.C.C. N0.^% /2010 •^fl

¶4

(Arising out of M.A.(C) No. 1217/2009)

¶5

^ APPLICANT .,\ip' (Appellant) V"v".^^ ^"J^ .».ey-

¶6

Manish Agrawal, Son of M.L.Agrawal, aged about 37 years, Bus Owner, R/o.Ramadhin Marg, Rajnandgaon,

VERSUS

fNON-APPLICANTSl 1.

(Respondents)

Hemant Kumar, S/o. Sitaram Sahu, aged about 37 years, Driver, R/o. Village Saloni, Tahsil Ghumka, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

¶11

¶12

¶13

The New India Insurance Co. Ltd., Through : The Branch Manager, %?+Kamthi Line^Rajnandgaon (C.G.), ?'

¶14

Sanjeev Agrawal, Son of Madan Lal

¶15

Agrawal, aged about 41 years,

¶16

Transporter, R/o. Ramadhin Marg,

¶17

^-Rajnandgaon (C.G.),

¶18

APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF M.A..fC)NO.l217/ 2009. DISMISSED ON 20-04-2010 FOR WANT OF PRQSECUTION

¶19

¶20

TSf T, '®^kTr1S,fs|01^lj,< ^ C C «ro . '2> 2-<?/^' ° r"--"----"---"""Y---wiae&

¶21

	3(1^11!?5R7 (tcl(3<!"t.'	iT)
s^VWVw* ~aiisn^iwm?	^nw^feisii^i	*l<li<-l<i)-f'WRJf'iffS^SA^K ^affin an^T
	S.B. Hon'bleShri Justice N.K.Agarvj	fa!
	07-07-2010 Shri BasantKaiwartya, counsei Noneforthe non-aDDlicants. Heard on M.C.C. The instant application is dir^ 20-04-2010 whereby M.A.fC) N0.121T prosecution. After going through the detait) hearing iearned counsel for the apc	applicant has succeeded in explaii appearance. Therefore, the applicatio) restored to its origlnat number. ( ! (
	Let the copy of this ordei) No.1217/2009. Listthe M.A.(C) No.1217/2009j d	be annexed with M.A.(C) fiertwoweeks.
r	N	Sd/- .K.Agarwai Judge

¶22

Kvr

Manish Agrawal v. Hemant Kumar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Agrawal v. Hemant Kumar and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shatrughan Dhruv Vs Devki Bai and Another

Dauwa Sinh Rajput and Others Vs Raju and Anothers

Lakhan Vs Dela Bai and Others

Aynul Huk Vs Arvind Kumar Agrawal and Others

Dr.Tarun Kumar Naik Vs Rajesh Deshmukh and Others

Dr.Tarun Kumar Naik Vs Prafull Maheshwari and Others