In this single-sentence order, the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the applicant's petition for restoration of S.A. No. 6/2010 once but subsequently restored it after hearing learned counsel who explained the appellant's absence as a mistake.
S.A. No. 6/2010 is restored to its original file for hearing immediately after two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
^pV
IN THE HIGHCOURT OF JUDICATUREOF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
M.C.C. N0.^0 4 /2010 S.A. N0. 6(1/1993
'pgia
'PUCANT
Lakhan, aged about SOyears,, ^JS/o Ramadhin Thethwar by occupation cttftivation, R/o '...••'.Rampur Tahsil Chuikhadan, District ^'"/.^^' .R?]'nandgaon.
(Appellant)
^'^ •»w....^ VERSUS (C^
NON-APPLICANS 1. Dela Bai, aged about 58 years, Wd/o Bisahu, by occupation cultivation and labour, R/o Banjarpur, P.0. No. 2 Tahsit Chuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon.
3.5tate of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh) through to Collector Rajnandgaon.
APPUCATION FOR RESTORATION OF THE SECOND APPEAL N0. 60/1993" fS.B.V DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION ON 06.04.2010.
I-HC—78
^'=F -^WWi, Qfll'H'IS, f°<dl'M^<
^Wvil ^^^---vy---y<'~r^u---ys^^(^......^g^.^--- 200
sii^i TraqT (1pf3^ti)
aiitw 'w Pt-ti*
TOiWtfesii^r +l<<kl«<1l t7IH?if '^ fe[^ •rf^t'^R
(W '3?I^?T Sti*ti-^ ^i'siRn 3ii^i
S.B. Iton'Me Shri Just^ N.K. Aanwrt
03L07^(110
Shri Locten Janghel,
Shri Suryakant Mishra, Pan^l Lawyer fbr Stele.
- tleaidjin Ne.i
Leamed counsel appeartng for the applicart sutenite ttat
the counsel fw the Eqapellant Id not a^ear w aecourrt of
bonafide mistake, ther^ore, SlA No. V1^3, wtteh was
dismissed on 06.04.2010, fll
On dt consideraUon, ailn ttwrt the couiwel for
appellant issucceeded In explai<iit^ ttie cause c^ his absence,
therefore, the afyltealton is smd SA No. M/l^ is
restored to its ortginaf flte.
A copy of this order be on record of Ure sr^lnat
s^peal and Uie same be li^ed f((r immeeBatdy aftar two
^ weeks.
Sd/- •
N.K.Agarawal
Sahu
Judge
4-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to restore S.A. No. 6/2010 dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel explained absence due to bona fide mistake.
Lakhan
Non-Applicans
N.K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
