Dr.Tarun Kumar Naik v. Prafull Maheshwari and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
-w^^^.y^:ws^ ...!..'...-:.........(3)F^......…
-w^^^.y^:ws^ ...!..'...-:.........(3)F^......…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A^ ^^^,y fW^^U3F^ ,np ^T-w^^^.y^: ws^ ...!..'...-: .........(3) F^......
,"- U'f>Tr»'
°Y-T/'S??
ll^p; tfct^ttS ]ii^]K> ib'lky i* iisyi?
l.syic hC^B> * uaji^. '^teitrt.a I&^IK" >^ty^.l:>'3J t ).l">klh '•lbl;>jl>l'fc qauafr .KSa^ .^.^^.^,....^.^.^ ^ 'P^'. ^^ ?snf:VV'""'\ iTT. 'z tblhitt lUhltt "'o'^reTTT:
'^^l^s^ "yv^T^T^ i&^ii j^ue
^ f-v^^^J^f l-y°A^ '' ~ ^. ^'r^ y- ^'?yti.^%—.. ' |%T;»II.>I»]'2iA[iie 'bUlblh- to.p ^Z-OH-K fw^Ofai ISS ^p^^-^^Q ^^J^^^__^P^T^-A^ ^ °^ ^.^ >^^-^? ^^^^ ^L-^-^^cf^y /^ ^ ^ "^
^L-^-^^cf^y /^ ^ ^ "^
-3:5E[ ^traRpT, ^ftwis, f°«Yii'y'i<
^Cc ^io. •S^^l°
an^T'qg^C^pf^1')
|an^i^iTftro; |
nsnsn^awiw|wnw^iteiai^i|'+llld'fl'ltlllrit^fftTSt <Rn^;]<
i?3ifim3n^T|
|---|---|---|
||S.B. Hon'bleShri Justice N.K.Ab
'-Q7-S
dat^
learn^
This is office reference.
This
Court vide
order
No.955/2006 directed that the
as early as possible preferabty withifi
date ofreceiDt ofthis order.
However, by this office referf
(F.T.C.), Durg has prayed for extens
decidethe Civil Suit No.7-A/2007.
Prayer is allowed.
A further time of six monthsl
decidethe Civil Suitfromthedateof
Accordingiy,the office referem
^
t
l
l|arwal
d
d
29-10-2009
passed
in
MA.
triat Court shali decide the suit
a period of six months from th®
nce, 8'" Additional Distt. Judge
ion of six months further time to
is granted to the trial Court to
eceipt of copy of this order.
estands disposed of.|
Sd/-
N.K. Agarwal Judge
N.K. Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court